Home Online Advertising Chrome Is Rolling Back SameSite Security Changes Because Of Coronavirus

Chrome Is Rolling Back SameSite Security Changes Because Of Coronavirus

SHARE:

Google is temporarily reversing its plan to stop supporting cross-site third-party cookie sharing by default, citing the “extraordinary global circumstances due to COVID-19.”

This decision means the SameSite changes Chrome started enforcing when it released Chrome 80 in February are on hold. It plans to restart the process at some point over the summer.

In a blog post on Friday, Justin Schuh, director of Chrome engineering, noted that Google “recognize[s] the efforts of sites and individual developers who prepared for this change and appreciate the feedback from the web ecosystem, which has helped inform this decision.”

Although most sites were prepared for the change, Schuh said, Chrome wants “to ensure stability for websites providing essential services, including banking, online groceries, government services and healthcare that facilitate our daily life during this time.”

The primary purpose of the SameSite change is to explicitly label third-party cookies for security purposes. Once enforced, insecure third-party cookies that aren’t accessed over HTTPS and properly classified will no longer be readable across sites, which will make analytics and attribution impossible for domains that aren’t following the rules.

Some view the SameSite as a step on the road toward doing away with third-party cookies for good.

“Google is forcing ad tech to accept SameSite by saying that cookies aren’t going to work without it,” Ken Weiner, CTO of GumGum told AdExchanger in a previous interview. “I guess you could call it a lily pad for ad tech on the way to the cookieless deep end … [but] ad tech is going to end up in that deep end sooner or later regardless.”

Speaking of, Chrome has no plans to postpone phasing out third-party cookies, which is still on the calendar for 2022.

In late March, a business group within the World Wide Web Consortium requested that Google extend the deadline in light of disruptions and uncertainty due to the COVID-19 situation.

Google politely declined, noting that “a discussion around adjusting timelines is premature.”

Must Read

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)