Home On TV & Video Why CTV Belongs At The Top, Not The Bottom, Of Your Marketing Funnel

Why CTV Belongs At The Top, Not The Bottom, Of Your Marketing Funnel

SHARE:

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Today’s column is by Andrew Mullins, director of programmatic at Realtime Agency.

We’ve all seen a traditional marketing funnel: Awareness and consideration typically will sit at the top and are judged by soft metrics such as impressions and views. Purchase and loyalty are at the bottom and judged by hard sales or conversions.  

Traditional TV ads have historically sat at the top of the marketing funnel. But where do we place connected TV? It is TV, after all.

Unlike traditional television, connected TV (CTV) marries a century-old piece of technology – your TV – with the capabilities of the internet: think data, interactivity, tracking, more reliable attribution, etc. This presents an interesting challenge when we think about where CTV belongs in a marketing funnel. 

It is TV, but it isn’t.

Engagement is lacking

CTV allows marketers to target ads to granular first-party audiences, inside specific geos, with frequency capping and modeling layered on top. This means that while CTV CPMs can often be on-par or higher than traditional TV CPMs, the quality of impression often surpasses what you’d find with traditional TV CPMs. 

On top of that, connected TV ads are becoming more interactive, with companies like Innovid and Brightline pioneering high-impact units that make the TV screen look more like a phone or computer. Google is even rolling out shoppable TV ads that allow consumers to scroll through, browse and purchase products from their TV screens. Already, CTV ad buying tactics can mirror tactics used for other digital channels. Advertisers can use website retargeting/remarketing or even lookalikes to reach high-intent prospecting audiences.

While interactive units might be impactful and have demonstrated to dramatically increase customer engagement, the direct action clickthrough rates on TVs are nowhere near the 3%-5% rates advertisers can garner on Facebook or native placements. Interactive technology just isn’t seamless enough to make users feel compelled to pick up a remote and engage. 

CTV is just better TV

Some advertisers will tell you that CTV can compete alongside any of the best mid-to-lower funnel placements out there. But the data and TV technology just don’t support this – yet. That’s why connected TV doesn’t strictly belong lower in the marketing funnel than traditional TV. Instead, with today’s technological landscape, it should simply be viewed as a smarter way to run upper-funnel advertising. Although that’s not to say this won’t change in the near future.

After studying tens of thousands of points of data to measure the effectiveness of upper-funnel marketing across platforms, we’ve concluded that CTV does a 20%-30% better job on average than any other placement in driving brand-changing engagement metrics due to its ability to target audiences in an environment that is sound-on, unskippable and completely viewable.

While direct response marketing strategies probably won’t deliver great performance when interactive CTV ads are compared to their social and native placements, CTV is a brand marketer’s best friend. It prevents the waste linear TV buyers see in oversaturated audiences and targeting outside of the desired geo. And it gives advertisers the data and control they need to get their ads in front of the users they need for brand growth.

Follow Realtime Agency (@realtime) and AdExchanger (@AdExchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Omnicom Investors Cheer IPG Sell-Off, Despite Weak Ad Spend In Q2

Omnicom is halfway through a major sell-off of IPG agencies. Its future looks healthier as it prunes lower-growth firms, including eliminating certain specialist firms and overlapping agencies in certain countries.

Hundreds of emails, depositions and other documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google antitrust trial, providing a fascinating look at how Google talked about its own products when no one else was watching – especially tools to counteract the rise of header bidding.

Why PubMatic Ditched Its Prebid Web Wrapper, But Never Its SDK

Earlier this month, PubMatic shelved its Prebid integration wrapper, known as OpenWrap Web, and announced it would begin recommending Playwire as an offloading-onboarding partner for the 250-odd publishers that use its wrapper.

Gareth Glaser, Co-Founder & CEO, Gamera

Google’s Buyer Direct Could Beat Agentic Ad Tech At Its Own Game

Agentic AI shows promise for direct deals. But if Google has its way, Buyer Direct could put an end to all sorts of agentic direct sales opportunities while they’re still in the cradle.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Warner Bros. Discovery Is Creating Value Out Of Dead Air With Pause Ads

Streaming publishers are banking on pause ads to bolster revenue with a more user-friendly ad experience. With programmatic standardization still pending, Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a stab at advancing the capabilities behind its own pause ad formats.

Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU

Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. 

Comic: It's Coming For You

Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access

A DSP refused to give ad industry watchdog Check My Ads a seat on its platform, even after both parties cosigned a master service agreement, citing concerns about “protections” for “vendor and supply partners.”