Home On TV & Video Addressable’s Next Step Won’t Be Fueled By Connected TV

Addressable’s Next Step Won’t Be Fueled By Connected TV

SHARE:

On TV and Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Chris Maccaro, CEO at Beachfront.

The market for addressable TV advertising is projected to almost double in the next two years. 

Over the last several months, the rapid rise in addressable has been driven by increases in the number of connected TV devices as consumers shift toward streaming. The next step for addressable, however, won’t be fueled by connected TV, but instead by bringing addressability to traditional linear TV. EMarketer estimates that addressability could contribute more than $3.6 billion in TV advertising by 2022. 

There are three reasons why legacy TV is the key to addressability: 

  1. Pay TV’s resilient scale;
  2. Media buyers’ diversified TV investments; and 
  3. Infrastructure retrofitting opportunities.  

Pay TV’s scale: Even when considering the enormous shifts of 2020, traditional TV as we know it is not going away anytime soon, and as the eMarketer chart below shows, it’s still where audiences are spending the most time. Both pay TV and non-pay-TV households are predicted to sit at 60+ million through 2024. 

Also, consider the financial impact of pay TV’s resilient scale: advertisers will spend the most money on cable and broadcast television. By investing in these environments, and how and when they decide to serve addressable ads, it meets TV advertisers where they are already, versus trying to convince them there’s a better opportunity elsewhere.

Media buyers’ diversified TV investments: Here’s where things get interesting as increasingly savvy, modern media buyers push the industry further into transformation. Connected TV has democratized access to TV inventory for more digitally inclined ad buyers, who are jumping on the opportunity to invest in impressions and spots on the biggest screen in the home. Programmers benefit tremendously from bringing linear into the fold, commingling traditional TV inventory with this CTV inventory and unlocking pent up addressable dollars from a wider set of advertisers. 

Infrastructure retrofitting opportunities: Today, the physical infrastructure of pay TV is embedded in more than 70 million homes in the United States. Even with small declines moving forward, pay TV’s unquestionable scale requires comparable technological advancement to what’s transformed connected TV the past several years. There are ways to retrofit traditional TV’s infrastructure. It takes time, but the business opportunity is just too big to ignore, and shouldn’t be discarded simply because of the growing prowess of streaming TV. 

Let’s recap and discuss the best path forward for making addressability a reality in legacy TV.

For starters, programmers need decisioning systems that connect disparate viewing points. Pay TV — across local and national, broadcast and cable — is capable of providing lucrative addressable opportunities, yet it lacks the advertising infrastructure needed to fully capitalize on those opportunities. 

Further, industry-accepted measurement standards and use of more first-party data are critical. Legacy TV infrastructure changes may even help on the measurement side; with uniform buying comes uniform measurement. 

Most importantly, advertisers hold the purse strings. It’s tough to deny the trend of brands seeking a shift to more efficient, uniform ad buying practices across all forms of media. 

Buyers are already shifting from manual insertion orders to more advanced systems that are capable of automating creative delivery and versioning in real-time. As a result, programmers require more sophisticated decisioning engines built to handle addressable functionality. 

These technologies include single advertiser slot optimization (SASO) and multiple advertiser slot optimization (MASO), the latter of which may necessitate the ability to manage high-frequency ad trading and mediation across hundreds of buyers (and multiple creatives per those buyers).

Establishing these systems takes collaboration and resources from networks, MVPDs and advertisers — even as ad tech providers and TV manufacturers (themselves, providers of ad tech infrastructure at this point) have already done a good bit of legwork there.

By doing the necessary infrastructure work to commingle legacy TV and connected TV inventory, we can accelerate our collective path toward a more addressable future.

Follow Beachfront (@beachfrontmedia) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Can An AI Solution Fix Misaligned Marketing Orgs?

Opal launched Gem, a new AI solution, to help large brands unify the layers of media and tech within their organizations.

Sports Publisher On3 Tries AI Recommendations To Keep Engagement In Its Home Court

Mula’s AI native content feed helps On3 keep its engagement and RPS consistent amid traffic drop-offs to publisher sites and the growing scarcity of online attention.

Comic: Race To The Bottom

Hearst Built A Unified Ad Marketplace To Simplify Omnichannel News Buys

Hearst is stitching together its far‑flung news properties into a single programmatic marketplace to simplify buying local news and shore up its business as the ad market shifts.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing

There’s MMM and MTA, but no single ad measurement works for brands with multiple points of sale. On Tuesday, Northbeam launched an incrementality tool to complete what it calls “the trifecta of digital attribution.”

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.