Home Digital TV and Video TvScientific To Charge Advertisers Only If A Campaign’s Desired Outcome Happens

TvScientific To Charge Advertisers Only If A Campaign’s Desired Outcome Happens

SHARE:

TvScientific really wants digital marketers (and their wallets) to open up to the idea of CTV as a performance channel.

On Thursday, the CTV ad platform unveiled a cost-per-outcome model to emphasize its confidence in connected TV ads leading to conversions.

TvScientific’s clients can already transact on any metric of their choosing, whether it be cost per acquisition, cost per app install, site visits, etcetera. What’s new is only charging advertisers when their campaigns achieve their intended goals.

Digital advertisers are more likely to include CTV as part of their performance-based media buys if they can do so with little risk – and without having to switch vendors, said tvScientific CEO Jason Fairchild.

“Advertisers looking for new, scalable performance channels should be putting TV at the top of their list,” he said.

Pining for performance

To reach more performance advertisers, tvScientific is also integrating directly into several affiliate marketing platforms, including Awin, Impact, Rakuten and CJ Affiliate (formerly Commission Junction).

This is a necessary “scale play,” Fairchild said, that gives tvScientific access to thousands of performance-based advertisers by partnering with their platform of choice “instead of convincing them to use ours.”

An advertiser using Rakuten or Impact, for example, can now add CTV spots to their performance marketing campaign and take care of the media buying and billing within their affiliate marketing platform.

But in the background, tvScientific is the one buying media across the major streaming services on behalf of the advertiser.

It then links the ad exposures to actions and purchases in the real world through existing partnerships with mobile measurement platforms, including AppsFlyer, Adjust and Kochava, and sends the attribution reporting to the affiliate platform so that buyers don’t have to switch systems.

TvScientific can also shift more budget to the best-performing ad creatives or placements based on how they’re doing midway through whatever attribution window is typical for the advertised product. Car sales, for instance, usually have a purchase consideration period of between 30 and 45 days, whereas a product like toothpaste has a much shorter attribution window.

As part of the optimization process, tvScientific can surmise how much it would cost for the campaign to scale enough to meet the advertiser’s goals.

Regardless of a campaign’s success, however, brands not working directly through tvScientific have to pay their affiliate platform for its services.

But tvScientific only gets paid if the campaign succeeds, Fairchild said.

Cost per outcome, therefore, introduces some risk for tvScientific, because it might not get compensated for its work. But after testing the strategy for eight months, the company is optimistic that it will work.

At this point, “we know how to manage risk,” Fairchild said. “The hit rate isn’t 100%, but I think it’s going to be way over 50%.”

As seen on CTV

So, will digital buyers buy in?

TvScientific piloted its cost-per-outcome option earlier this year, and advertiser clients, including Crocs, Groupon, LifeLock and Experian, have expressed interest in adding more performance-based reporting to their CTV buys.

“This makes CTV feel more like buying a lower-funnel channel,” said Steve Hartmann, head of integrated marketing at Experian’s direct-to-consumer business. Experian has already been buying streaming supply through tvScientific to help drive users to its credit reporting service.

For now, the ability to buy on a cost-per-outcome basis is only available through tvScientific’s managed service, which means that advertisers like Experian have less control over targeting and ad placements than they’re accustomed to. But that actually has its own advantages.

“We can find new audiences we hadn’t known would work for us,” Hartmann said. Reporting based on ad creative is also helpful for planning future campaigns, he added.

TvScientific plans to start offering cost-per-outcome pricing on a self-serve basis once it adds more automation to campaign planning and activation, which should happen “very soon,” Fairchild said, although he didn’t share an exact timeline.

Must Read

Kickbacks Takes An Outsider’s View While Bringing Ads To AI Agents

Andrew McCalip is a founding engineer at Varda Space Industries, where he oversees the manufacturing of things like hypersonic reentry vehicles and satellite buses.

CTV Buyers Are Getting The Show-Level Performance Optimization They’ve Always Wanted

A collaboration between InterMedia Advertising, Peer39 and Pontiac Intelligence provided show-level cost-per-acquisition data for 94% of CTV ad impressions.

Advertisers Await Programmatic Pause Ads

The IAB Tech Lab is working on standardizing programmatic signals for new streaming TV ad formats, including pause ads. Meanwhile, many brands are eager to add pause ads to their repertoire.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Why Media Mergers And Spin-Offs Don’t Always Keep Their Promises

With media megamergers, acquisitions and spin-offs left and right, the media landscape is changing at a pace that is difficult to keep up with.

TransUnion is partnering with Blockgraph so that advertisers can use its identity data to target, reach and measure TV households across channels.

How This Disaster Relief Nonprofit Tapped First-Party Data To Reach Donors Year-Round

Staying top of mind for potential donors is an ongoing challenge for Direct Relief. Nexxen’s audience curation helped it spread and sustain awareness.

Why Major UK Publishers Are Finally Joining Forces To Curate Ad Inventory

Atria’s collective approach is a response to growing monetization challenges and the need to protect the value of human journalism in the AI era.