Home Digital TV and Video TvScientific To Charge Advertisers Only If A Campaign’s Desired Outcome Happens

TvScientific To Charge Advertisers Only If A Campaign’s Desired Outcome Happens

SHARE:

TvScientific really wants digital marketers (and their wallets) to open up to the idea of CTV as a performance channel.

On Thursday, the CTV ad platform unveiled a cost-per-outcome model to emphasize its confidence in connected TV ads leading to conversions.

TvScientific’s clients can already transact on any metric of their choosing, whether it be cost per acquisition, cost per app install, site visits, etcetera. What’s new is only charging advertisers when their campaigns achieve their intended goals.

Digital advertisers are more likely to include CTV as part of their performance-based media buys if they can do so with little risk – and without having to switch vendors, said tvScientific CEO Jason Fairchild.

“Advertisers looking for new, scalable performance channels should be putting TV at the top of their list,” he said.

Pining for performance

To reach more performance advertisers, tvScientific is also integrating directly into several affiliate marketing platforms, including Awin, Impact, Rakuten and CJ Affiliate (formerly Commission Junction).

This is a necessary “scale play,” Fairchild said, that gives tvScientific access to thousands of performance-based advertisers by partnering with their platform of choice “instead of convincing them to use ours.”

An advertiser using Rakuten or Impact, for example, can now add CTV spots to their performance marketing campaign and take care of the media buying and billing within their affiliate marketing platform.

But in the background, tvScientific is the one buying media across the major streaming services on behalf of the advertiser.

It then links the ad exposures to actions and purchases in the real world through existing partnerships with mobile measurement platforms, including AppsFlyer, Adjust and Kochava, and sends the attribution reporting to the affiliate platform so that buyers don’t have to switch systems.

TvScientific can also shift more budget to the best-performing ad creatives or placements based on how they’re doing midway through whatever attribution window is typical for the advertised product. Car sales, for instance, usually have a purchase consideration period of between 30 and 45 days, whereas a product like toothpaste has a much shorter attribution window.

As part of the optimization process, tvScientific can surmise how much it would cost for the campaign to scale enough to meet the advertiser’s goals.

Regardless of a campaign’s success, however, brands not working directly through tvScientific have to pay their affiliate platform for its services.

But tvScientific only gets paid if the campaign succeeds, Fairchild said.

Cost per outcome, therefore, introduces some risk for tvScientific, because it might not get compensated for its work. But after testing the strategy for eight months, the company is optimistic that it will work.

At this point, “we know how to manage risk,” Fairchild said. “The hit rate isn’t 100%, but I think it’s going to be way over 50%.”

As seen on CTV

So, will digital buyers buy in?

TvScientific piloted its cost-per-outcome option earlier this year, and advertiser clients, including Crocs, Groupon, LifeLock and Experian, have expressed interest in adding more performance-based reporting to their CTV buys.

“This makes CTV feel more like buying a lower-funnel channel,” said Steve Hartmann, head of integrated marketing at Experian’s direct-to-consumer business. Experian has already been buying streaming supply through tvScientific to help drive users to its credit reporting service.

For now, the ability to buy on a cost-per-outcome basis is only available through tvScientific’s managed service, which means that advertisers like Experian have less control over targeting and ad placements than they’re accustomed to. But that actually has its own advantages.

“We can find new audiences we hadn’t known would work for us,” Hartmann said. Reporting based on ad creative is also helpful for planning future campaigns, he added.

TvScientific plans to start offering cost-per-outcome pricing on a self-serve basis once it adds more automation to campaign planning and activation, which should happen “very soon,” Fairchild said, although he didn’t share an exact timeline.

Must Read

Google Touts Its AI Ad Tech Adoption And New AI Max Features

Google announced new features and ad types for AI Max, its AI-based bidding product for search and shopping or sponsored product ads. The company also touted “hundreds of thousands” of advertisers using AI Max.

Hand pressing blue AI button on keyboard. Digital collage of artificial intelligence interface.

Meta’s Ad Machine Is Purring, So Why Did Its Stock Drop?

Meta’s Q1 call sounded like an AI and hardware pitch, but under the hood it was still about one thing: investing in AI to squeeze more money out of its ads business.

Alphabet Exceeds $100 Billion In Q1 And Its Profits Almost Doubled

Alphabet earned $109.9 billion in Q1 this year, up from $90.2 billion a year ago. And that’s not even the truly gobsmacking number.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: It's Coming For You

Omnicom Has An AI-Powered Plan To Cut Out Ad Tech Middlemen

Omnicom is rebuilding its media machine around Acxiom and agentic AI in a bid to push more spend to publishers and sidestep the “messy middle.”

Rakuten And Impact.com Forge A New Alliance That Resets The Affiliate Industry

The two longest-standing names in the affiliate and partnership marketing category, Rakuten and Impact.com, have decided to stop fighting each other and will instead fight together. 

Comic: S.P. O’Middleman’s

The Trade Desk Makes Its DSP Available Within Skai And Pacvue

The Trade Desk announced that it will begin allowing mutual clients to use its DSP within the Pacvue or Skai platforms.