Home Digital TV and Video TubeMogul Files S-1, Seeks To Raise $75M In IPO

TubeMogul Files S-1, Seeks To Raise $75M In IPO

SHARE:

tubemogulVideo demand-side platform TubeMogul on Wednesday filed its S-1 registration document with the US Securities Exchange Commission, signaling its intention to raise $75 million in an initial public offering. Read the S-1.

In the filing, TubeMogul stated, “For 2011, 2012 and 2013, our total revenue was $15.7 million, $34.2 million and $57.2 million, respectively, representing a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 91%, and Total Spend through our platform was $17.8 million, $53.8 million, and $111.9 million, respectively, representing a CAGR of 151%.”

Its gross margins have grown similarly in each of the last three years. Those margins were 48% in 2011, 52% in 2012 and 66% in  2013. Net loss was $4.1 million, $3.6 million and $7.4 million, respectively.

TubeMogul offers both self-serve and managed services models, and in 2013 it supported campaigns for 2,000 individual brands – mostly through agencies but in a handful of cases directly with  marketers.

The programmatic video company did not say how many shares of common stock it would sell nor at what price, so its approximately market valuation remains unknown.

The S-1 disclosed compensation for TubeMogul’s C-suite executives:

tubemogul-execs

A “Ctrl+F” suggests that TubeMogul is attempting to build a SaaS story with 626 mentions of the word “platform.” “Programmatic,” meanwhile, gets 20 mentions.

Whether “TUBE” is truly a software solution, vs. a human-based transactional platform, remains to be seen.  It may be that the company is eager to play up its software licensing models because platform companies tend to earn higher multiples in “revenue events” such as IPOs and acquisitions. Here is more on the company’s SaaS vs. managed service offerings, from the S-1:

“Our Platform Direct offering allows advertisers to run self-serve campaigns eliminating the often complex and inefficient RFP process through which digital media is typically bought. Platform Direct customers enter into master service agreements with us that enable them to execute all of their campaigns under the agreement without the need for campaign-by-campaign insertion orders, or IOs. We generate Platform Direct revenue by charging our customers a utilization fee that is a percentage of media spend as well as fees for additional features offered through our platform. Because Platform Direct customers have control of the media purchasing decisions through our platform, our Platform Direct revenue is recognized on a net basis, meaning that it only includes our fees and not the cost of media purchased. The gross margin for our Platform Direct offering for 2013 was 95%.

Our Platform Services offering allows advertisers who continue to use a traditional RFP process to realize the benefits of our platform without needing to alter their purchasing process. Platform Services arrangements are generally in the form of discrete IOs which are negotiated on a campaign-by-campaign basis. We generate Platform Services revenue by delivering digital video advertisements based upon our customer’s campaign specifications. Our Platform Services revenue is recognized on a gross basis, meaning that it includes the cost of the media purchased. The gross margin for our Platform Services offering for 2013 was 51%.”

John Ebbert contributed. 

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.