Home Digital TV and Video A Peek Into TubeMogul’s Financials As Company Issues Follow-On Stock Worth $82.9M

A Peek Into TubeMogul’s Financials As Company Issues Follow-On Stock Worth $82.9M

SHARE:

Brett-Wilson-TubeMogul-2015-2TubeMogul issued its follow-on stock price late Wednesday in a secondary deal worth $82.9 million. The video ad platform will return about $55 million in primary capital to the company by selling 3.5 million shares at a rate of $15.75 a share.

The share price is about twice the $7 rate it commanded at its IPO last July and slightly above its original target price of $11-$13 per share.

The company wants to make it easier for large investors to own a part of TubeMogul.

“This was [our] signaling to the market that we’re going to manage an orderly transition of venture capital shares to the public market and, in doing so, we’ve increased our total availability of stock,” CEO Brett Wilson told AdExchanger.

Individual early-stage investors including Wilson will sell an additional 1.7 million in secondary shares, representing about $27.9 million. TubeMogul had $36.9 million cash in reserve at the end of Q1.

The company will also grant deal underwriters a 30-day option to buy up to 789,486 additional shares of common stock.

“For me personally, after a challenged IPO a year ago, I feel like we really finished what we started,” Wilson said. “We did exactly what we told investors we’d do since last July and we meaningfully improved the business in just a year.” 

Similar to other ad tech companies, TubeMogul’s stock has been battered by the public market at times. Its stock was down nearly 9% when it initially filed its S-1 for the follow-on offering June 1. It seemed to reclaim its momentum and climbed 7.9% last week when Comcast announced its planned acquisition of TV ad tech company Visible World.

Wilson said the company’s secondary filing reinforces its independent status, adding additional financing will keep it nimble while it explores additional growth opportunities.

“We’re not spending more, there’s no M&A [planned] – this was an opportunistic [move] to strengthen our balance sheet, because so much of the company is owned by venture capitalists,” he said.

Brian Wieser of Pivotal Research noted the follow-on offering sustains Tube’s independent status, though it doesn’t necessarily discount external interest: “They’re better positioned now if a larger company thought they’d serve as a strategic acquisition choice.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Why Wall Street Turned Against The Trade Desk

The Trade Desk is less than a third as valuable as it was a year ago. It retains about one-tenth of its high-water market cap from December 2024, when the company was worth almost $70 billion. Why did investors lose the faith?

Garrett McGrath, President, Prebid.org

Prebid’s New President Is Its Former Chairman, Garrett McGrath

McGrath left Prebid in June following five years as board chairman after stepping down as SVP of product management at Magnite. But now, overseeing Prebid will be his full-time job.

TV Manufacturer Telly Touts Programmatic Home Screen Ads

Telly, the startup that gives away free smart TVs in exchange for data and ad exposure, is making its home screen ads available for brands to buy programmatically – and pushing for industry standards to help attract more spend. 

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Is Helping L’Oréal Brainstorm Unique Ways To Reach Male Audiences

L’Oréal adopted creative AI platform Springboards to generate creative ideas that led to a collaborative, ongoing ideation process.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

Google won’t have to break up its ads business after being declared an online monopolist. Meanwhile, Amazon faces a lawsuit from the FTC alleging that it charged advertisers more than necessary for ecommerce ads.

The FTC’s Amazon Lawsuit Is Ad Tech’s History Of Opacity Repeating Itself

Buy-side experts said it’s another example of a Big Tech platform taking advantage of the lack of transparency built into programmatic ad auctions. And they’re not optimistic change is coming.