Home Data Forrester Report: Customers And Brands Have Different Definitions Of Value, Transparency

Forrester Report: Customers And Brands Have Different Definitions Of Value, Transparency

SHARE:

fatemehCompanies face a paradox.

Consumers want to be rewarded for their loyalty to a company or brand, but recoil when asked to share their personal data. At the same time, companies risk losing their competitive edge by not personalizing their offerings and acknowledging loyal customers.

Marketers toss around terms like “value” and “transparency” when explaining how to win a customer’s trust, but a company’s understanding of these terms may differ from consumer expectations.

When Forrester Research surveyed approximately 5,000 US adults on why they’d share personal information with companies and how companies can win their trust, it found tangible rewards like cash are more desirable than convenience.

Forty-one percent of respondents said they’d share personal information with companies for cash rewards. Nearly 30% would share their data in exchange for loyalty program points and only 11% chose faster customer service.

Being transparent about how you handle consumers’ data is also critical, said the report’s author, senior analyst Fatemeh Khatibloo. “Despite the demand for relevance and recognition,” she wrote, “customers are loathe [sic] to think that their data is out of their control, and that it’s being used not just for preferential treatment, but potentially to discriminate against them too.”

A transparent privacy policy should explain when the company collects user data, what it does with the data, whether it will sell or share the data and whether it will delete the data when asked to, according to the report.

“Transparency can start with process and design, so that may be the easiest thing that many companies can do,” Khatibloo told AdExchanger. “As for meaningful choice, this is the one that has the most upside for the marketer – there is so much waste in marketing communications, that simply asking customers to choose how they want us to communicate can have a positive effect on marketing efficiency.”

Providing customization options instead of just allowing consumers to opt in or out of interacting with one’s company is another way to keep people engaged. “The single most powerful tool in a marketer’s arsenal is the preference center,” according to Khatibloo.

When given the option, consumers are more likely to tell companies what they prefer, according to the survey findings. Nearly a third of consumers have used a preference center to indicate their channel preferences, and 27% have used one to indicate their frequency or interest preferences.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Implementing these changes can seem extensive and daunting, Khatibloo acknowledged. “The recommendations all disrupt the marketing tech stack a little, so which one a company tackles first depends not only on their desire, but what they can do,” Khatibloo said.

The bottom line, Khatibloo wrote, is that being transparent and offering meaningful choices will make customers receptive to telling businesses how, when and where they want to interact.

Must Read

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

CPG Data Seller SPINS Moves Into Media With MikMak Acquisition

On Wednesday, retail and CPG data company SPINS added a new piece with its acquisition of MikMak, a click-to-buy ad tech and analytics startup that helps optimize their commerce media.

How Valvoline Shifted Marketing Gears When It Became A Pure-Play Retail Brand

Believe it or not, car oil change service company Valvoline is in the midst of a fascinating retail marketing transformation.

The Big Story: Live From CES 2026

Agents, streamers and robots, oh my! Live from the C-Space campus at the Aria Casino in Las Vegas, our team breaks down the most interesting ad tech trends we saw at CES this year.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

A few years ago, “data clean rooms” were all the ad tech trades could talk about. Fast-forward to 2026, and maybe advertisers don’t need to know what a data clean room is after all.

The AI Search Reckoning Is Dismantling Open Web Traffic – And Publishers May Never Recover

Publishers have been losing 20%, 30% and in some cases even as much as 90% of their traffic and revenue over the past year due to the rise of zero-click AI search.