Home Data-Driven Thinking The Psychology of Pandemic-Induced Shopping Behaviors

The Psychology of Pandemic-Induced Shopping Behaviors

SHARE:
Swaroop Reddy, CIO at Omnicom Precision Marketing Group.

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Swaroop Reddy, CIO at Omnicom Precision Marketing Group.

It would be short-sighted to believe humans would be unaffected by evolution. Adaptation has kept species going for millennia. Humans have adapted mental attributes to keep fit for survival, and one such attribute is our fear of death.

Logically, we know all humans die. Yet, somehow, reminders of our own mortality (i.e., mortality salience) trigger dramatic behavioral change. To go about our day-to-day lives, humans have evolved to “deal” with reminders of our impending death.

This defense mechanism is known as terror management theory (TMT). It dictates that any death reminder will initiate a spectrum of behaviors designed to protect and uplift our sense of self. And these adaptations include changes in purchasing behavior, too.

Behavior changes when mortality is made salient

First, there’s the rise-above response. When humans face threats, we try to put ourselves in a position of superiority. We’re more inclined to fund and support social causes, work to improve ourselves or attempt to elevate ourselves by becoming more attuned to spirituality or religion.

Then, there’s the instant gratification response. We invest in things that give us an immediate sense of self-worth. If we want to buy a car, we eye the one that’s just out of reach. If we want to buy a house, we sacrifice more to afford a larger down payment. Even if we’re buying tuna, we reach for the fanciest can on the shelf. It all depends on our construct of achievement.

When marketers see these trends, they attribute them to a short-lived response to a situation. That’s because our data on TMT was previously generated by inducing mortality awareness through short-lived tactics, such as a video or funeral. 

But what if the exposure-inducing mortality salience was ongoing?

When mortality reminders are consistent enough, they have the power to fundamentally change consumer behavior for years to come. And what better reminder than a deadly multiyear pandemic? 

The impact of COVID-19

Humans’ sense of mortality transcends culture, religion, age, etc. With this in mind, companies must alter their marketing messages to account for the value changes consumers have experienced over the past two years. These are sustained behavioral changes that can (and will) impact a company’s growth strategy.

For example, a colleague of mine recently posited that all brands are now health-and-wellness brands. This is clearly a result of the rush to sanitize and support people suffering from the pandemic’s social and physical challenges. 

However, this evolution is also significantly influenced by global shifts in value perception and consumer psychological responses to mortal threats. For instance, one study found a dramatic increase in charitable giving in countries with heightened COVID-19 awareness.

Another interesting example is the surge in luxury sales during the pandemic. In January 2022, Cartier reported a 32% increase in sales during the fourth quarter of 2021 compared with the final three months of 2020. Prada earned 8% more in 2021 than it did in 2019, and Louis Vuitton, Dior and BMW all boasted higher-than-expected 2021 sales.

It’s only just begun

Researchers and marketers don’t yet know how TMT principles will continue to shape purchasing behavior and influence companies’ future approach to data and technology. However, if marketers follow the constructions of behavioral economic theorists like Dan Ariely, they’ll likely see a “self-herding effect” after the pandemic. 

Ariely describes self-herding as the “tendency to follow the same decision we have made in the past, with future decisions influenced by previous decisions.”

What can marketers and consumers learn from this? In short, the pandemic will eventually end, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the behaviors we’ve adopted will end with it. Marketers can’t expect a rapid return to “business as usual” because human psychology has been irrevocably impacted.

The COVID-19 pandemic will continue to impact how humans perceive reality. But unlike two years ago, marketers now have the research and data to understand it. They just have to start applying those insights. 

Follow Omnicom (@Omnicom) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

AdExchanger Senior Editors Anthony Vargas and Alyssa Boyle.

POSSIBLE 2026: AdExchanger's Hot Takes

AdExchanger Senior Editors Alyssa Boyle and Anthony Vargas share their takeaways from three days chatting about agentic AI at POSSIBLE.

Reddit Reports A 75% Boost In Q1 Ad Revenue As It Reaches For 100 Million Daily US Users

Generative AI search has pushed traffic off a cliff across most of the internet, but not on social platforms. Reddit included.

POSSIBLE 2026: Can AI Help Agencies Finally Break Down Those Silos?

Domenic Venuto, indie agency Horizon Media’s chief product and data officer, sat down with AdExchanger during POSSIBLE at the Fontainebleau in Miami to unpack the role of AI in today’s media and advertising landscape.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Google Touts Its AI Ad Tech Adoption And New AI Max Features

Google announced new features and ad types for AI Max, its AI-based bidding product for search and shopping or sponsored product ads. The company also touted “hundreds of thousands” of advertisers using AI Max.

Hand pressing blue AI button on keyboard. Digital collage of artificial intelligence interface.

Meta’s Ad Machine Is Purring, So Why Did Its Stock Drop?

Meta’s Q1 call sounded like an AI and hardware pitch, but under the hood it was still about one thing: investing in AI to squeeze more money out of its ads business.

Alphabet Exceeds $100 Billion In Q1 And Its Profits Almost Doubled

Alphabet earned $109.9 billion in Q1 this year, up from $90.2 billion a year ago. And that’s not even the truly gobsmacking number.