Home Data-Driven Thinking To Extend Or Amplify, That Is The Question

To Extend Or Amplify, That Is The Question

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Keith Petri, chief strategy officer at Screen6.

A recent report from comScore showed that consumers are spending more time on their smartphones, tablets and connected TVs than ever before, and it’s not necessarily eating into the time spent on their desktops. The cross-platform consumer is a reality, and finding and targeting those consumers with relevant ads is the new endgame for digital marketers.

However, there is confusion among digital marketers on where and how to find those consumers – specifically when it comes to audience extension and amplification. From my experience, these approaches are thrown around and used interchangeably, and it is important that the industry knows the difference between the two and the benefit to advertisers.

Audience extension is all about trying to find new people to target. If you’re building an audience segment and you have identifiers of people that you know are within a specific group, audience extension is about finding similar people to the ones you already know. For example, an advertiser starts with a target audience, such as people who have registered for a test drive on an auto website. To increase the size of this core audience, one would use profiling data to find similar people in terms of age, demo and online behaviors. 

Advertisers use audience extension to reach greater numbers of people. To increase audiences even further in the hopes of better conversion rates, advertisers often broaden the matching criteria, which results in an even larger pool of people. So, for advertisers who have data on middle-aged men interested in BMWs, you extend that audience by modeling against similar cross-device and online behavioral attributes of your core audience.

Audience amplification is about providing personalized, targeted advertising to the people you already know. With audience amplification, you’re not making the audience bigger, you’re just increasing the chances of seeing your audience. Because you are targeting the people you already know, there is less waste. And because you know that a person is interested in BMWs, you want to target this person as soon and often as possible.

There are three ways to amplify and market to audiences from one device to another. One is intradevice audience amplification, where the consumer is followed from one application to another on a single device. The second is cross-device, which follows the consumer across the multiple connected devices they use within the course of a day. Finally, householding allows for an advertiser to serve dynamic creative ads to all the devices within a household, which allows also for more precise family-based targeting.

For most advertisers, the best solution is to use a combination of audience extension and audience amplification. If you start with an audience and then grow it through audience extension, you can still also amplify that same audience. The hybrid approach between audience extension and amplification most likely gives advertisers the biggest reach as well as the most custom experience for consumers.

Follow Screen6 (@Screen6HQ) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.