Home Data-Driven Thinking Can Facebook Catch Up To Google In Travel Advertising?

Can Facebook Catch Up To Google In Travel Advertising?

SHARE:

stephentaylorData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Stephen Taylor, senior vice president of enterprise solutions at Sojern.

Google set its eyes on the travel industry a while ago. Travel is one of its top ad revenue sources. The Priceline Group alone reportedly spent a big chunk of its $3.5 billion investment in search engine marketing with Google in 2016. That’s not to mention Google’s many travel products, including consumer travel planning apps and Google flights.

Now Facebook, with its formidable 1.7 billion monthly active users and penetration in more than 200 countries, is also beginning to consider the opportunities in the lucrative travel sector. But is it too late to the game?

When Facebook shuttered its ad exchange (FBX) in early 2016, travel brands could no longer use display ads on the social media giant to reach customers, unless they used Facebook’s Dynamic Product Ads. But there was a catch: Dynamic Product Ads were designed for ecommerce and lacked many parameters relevant to travel advertisers.

Take the real-time inventory feeds, for instance. The risk of serving the wrong price for an airline ticket could be construed as bait-and-switch, make consumers angry or even lead to a lawsuit, particularly in Europe, where the regulatory environment is even tighter than in the US. Add to that the fact that most real-time inventory feeds were created for websites, not for programmatic advertising – where you have 40 milliseconds to win the bid and serve the ad to the consumer – and you have a potential recipe for disaster.

To Facebook’s credit, it recognized early on that its Dynamic Product Ads were not suitable for travel brands, where the sheer number of core consumer purchase considerations – where, when, with whom and so on, combined with the rapidly changing pricing and product availability – all present a significant marketing challenge unique to the travel industry. So, the social networking giant started to cater to the hotel industry last year, with its first verticalized advertising product, Dynamic Ads for Travel (DAT), which it later expanded to destinations and flights.

If Facebook aims to take travel ad dollars from Google, DAT is certainly a step in the right direction. It combines the best of Dynamic Ads with parameters relevant to travel, such as specific arrival and departure dates, number of travelers, star ratings and airport codes. It also creates upsell opportunities by showing ads for more expensive hotels to users who viewed or searched for cheaper hotels in the same neighborhood and vice versa.

Until recently, Facebook was not a name with great visibility in the context of travel performance marketing, but that is changing rapidly as travel advertisers become aware of Facebook’s enormous potential to bring their ads in front of very highly targeted audiences, push the cost per booking down and boost revenues. One major advantage for brands is that Facebook is present throughout the entire funnel because of its ability to influence users through peer interactions at the very early stages of the path to purchase.

In travel, specifically, Facebook has a unique opportunity to capitalize on its vast reach at the top of the funnel, but the road ahead is steep. It remains to be seen if Facebook will jump on that upper-funnel discovery that is so important for travelers and often entails a significant amount of video consumption of things like destination promos, hotel room tours and city videos. Facebook could really hit gold with a solid video product that incorporates real-time pricing information and reach those coveted travelers before they get to the booking stage.

Even at the lower end of the funnel, DAT itself is not a panacea. Unlike most of Facebook’s ad products, it doesn’t work well with a “set-it-and-forget-it” strategy, and its pricing and availability feed setup, which allows in-market travelers to see pricing in real time, is quite complex.

Travel is a massive industry, and there might just be enough room for Google and Facebook to play in the sandbox together. But, for now, Facebook is just cracking the door open.

Follow Sojern (@Sojern) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The Trade Desk’s Revenue Growth Stalls As Big Brands Tighten Their Belts

“Our revenue growth is below our expectations and below the standard we hold ourselves to,” The Trade Desk CEO Jeff Green told investors.

Comic: Measuremints

Nielsen Is Acquiring DoubleVerify For $2.15 Billion

On Thursday, Nielsen entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DoubleVerify in an all cash transaction valued at approximately $2.15 billion.

WBD Hopes To Buoy Linear TV Long Enough For Streaming To Find Its Way

Warner Bros. Discovery cited softer ad sales growth and the continued decline of linear TV as its reasons for missing investor expectations in Q2. Unsurprisingly, streaming ads are the biggest bright spot on WBD’s earnings report card.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Mobile Freight Train

AppLovin Asks For Patience As It Grows Its Ecommerce And Consumer Ads Business

“We’re deemed a new bucket, so a testing category,” AppLovin CEO told investors regarding its nascent consumer and ecommerce ads business. “And to graduate up takes time. This stuff compounds over quarters and years.”

Magnite Doesn’t Want To Be A DSP. It Just Wants To Own The Decisioning Layer

On Wednesday, Magnite CEO Michael Barrett painted a picture of a company that’s edging into the buy side by adding more DSP-style capabilities for planning and activation.

For Cuisinart, AI-Generated Ads Are As Handy As A Kitchen Blender

Cuisinart’s marketing team has been eager to take advantage of generative AI-based creative.