Home CTV Roundup Copying Netflix Is Part Of The Streaming Profitability Playbook

Copying Netflix Is Part Of The Streaming Profitability Playbook

SHARE:

Hey, readers!

In case you were too busy to keep up on CTV trends this week because you’re watching the Olympics or reading up on Google losing the search antitrust case, don’t worry. This week’s CTV roundup has your CTV rundown.

Streaming services are at very different points in their pursuit of profitability.

This week, Disney announced that its combined streaming business (Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+) generated $47 million last quarter and is now profitable one quarter earlier than expected. Disney mostly has ESPN+ to thank – without which Disney reported a $19 million loss for just Disney+ and Hulu. (Disney+ and Hulu are reported as direct-to-consumer, whereas ESPN+ is sports.)

Meanwhile, Netflix’s operating margins grew 5% year-over-year, thanks to ads and ad-supported account growth.

Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), however, continues to suffer streaming losses, reporting a 5% YOY drop in revenue in Q2. It’s trying to monetize Max amid unprecedented streaming competition while still paying off the remaining debt from Warner Media’s acquisition of Discovery in 2022.

What Disney and WBD have in common, however, is a desire to copy Netflix.

Taking a page from Netflix

Netflix and Disney both say that ad-supported streaming has become a profitable part of their business after launching their respective services at roughly the same time: the end of 2022.

To some degree, this is evidence of maturation running its natural course. Now that both programmers have had ad-supported offerings for around the same amount of time at similar price points, they each have enough scale to start making a profit on subscriptions and ad revenue.

But in order to maintain its growth, Disney is taking a page from Netflix’s book.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Netflix has been touting the success of its anti-password sharing tactics for over a year, pointing to higher-than-expected subscriber growth numbers as proof. Now, Disney is putting anti-password-sharing enforcement in place, too. The Mouse House started disabling account sharing in June, with plans to ramp up its efforts in September.

Still, enforcing anti-password sharing isn’t easy to get right.

From a business perspective, streamers should focus on scaling subscriber growth for a new service before risking churn in an effort to achieve profitability. (To say that anti-account sharing is unpopular among viewers is an understatement.) So it makes sense that Disney wanted Disney+ to reach a certain level of scale before pursuing anti-password sharing in full force.

WBD, which is losing revenue, is also planning to erect barriers against password sharing. It’s launching in new international markets as quickly as it can, and timing anti-password sharing with global expansion could encourage more sign-ups in new markets.

WBD also just finished rolling out a new content personalization feature for Max’s homepage, which resembles Netflix’s content recommendation system. WBD is also testing a feature to allow viewers to rank titles they “like” or “love,” which may sound like an obvious move – but it’s predicated on tactics that Netflix has been monetizing for years.

My question is: Will Netflix’s competitors yield similar results by using Netflix’s playbook?

Let me know what you think. Hit me up at [email protected].

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.