Home Commerce Roundup How The Fin Tech Clearco Finances Ecommerce Startups (Without Losing Its Shirt)

How The Fin Tech Clearco Finances Ecommerce Startups (Without Losing Its Shirt)

SHARE:

This week, I caught up with a startup from outside the world of data-driven advertising, but with an interesting position when it comes to ecommerce advertising.

That’s Clearco, a Canadian fin tech company founded in 2015, which, earlier this month, raised a $100 million in financing from the bank Macquarie Group.

The digital-native ecommerce brand category is often thought of as a child of venture capital. But that’s in large part because those companies, as startups in a new field with little auditable history or established business fundamentals, had little access to traditional bank loans.

Clearco doesn’t provide loans, nor does it take an equity stake in startups that it finances, CEO Andrew Curtis told AdExchanger.

The company brought a common practice in the offline world, called revenue-based finance, to ecommerce, Curtis said. When Clearco offers capital to a startup, it takes a contractual stake in future revenue receivables. Unlike a loan, Clearco generally recoups its cash within four to six months.

Founders often choose Clearco’s financing model because it takes no equity, he said. The financing is often referred to as “non-dilutive capital.”

Traditional lenders often take equity if payments are missed, for instance, or require founders to put liens on physical assets, like warehousing and product inventory, which the lender will own if its capital isn’t returned.

“The space can be treacherous” for ecommerce fin techs like Clearco, Curtis said.

Another fin tech startup that provided banking services to ecommerce companies, called Parker, was founded in 2019 and raised $200 million before folding in May.

Why so treacherous?

Ecommerce startups and Shopify merchants have proven their viability. So what makes it so persistently difficult for companies in the category to attract cash-backers without giving up more and more equity in the business?

For Clearco, one of the major distinguishing factors in financing ecommerce startups is the nature of the online ad platforms they rely upon.

The obvious, most-important metric when Clearco evaluates a company is whether it demonstrates consistent revenue growth, Curtis said. Clearco is purchasing future revenue after all.

But the fin tech’s second biggest source of funding expenditures is for online advertising, he said. (The biggest expense Clearco finances is for inventory acquisition, like companies right now stocking up to have product for Black Friday.)

“These businesses are voracious consumers of working capital,” Curtis said.

In the past couple of years, there have been the back-to-back-to-back policy changes where Google, then Meta and now Amazon have forbidden the use of credit cards to purchase ads. This was a bit of a cash loophole, which startups used to inflate their rewards points and give themselves a bit of room to pay down campaigns.

Omnichannel growth

Many ecommerce startups need new financing as they expand to new channels, Curtis said, such as social-native brands investing in Amazon sales or jumping to physical retail with some grocery chain.

Ecommerce startups are an “agile crew,” Curtis said, adding that he’s not from the category but from banking and finance.

Legacy brands and all sorts of categories feel the same macro-economic fluctuations and tariff effects. But ecommerce companies depend on Big Tech platforms. “And these third parties can make changes. They’re behemoths,” he said.

Apple has made iOS changes that threw businesses for a loop; Amazon makes changes that push products down the search results; an algorithmic update to Meta’s News Feed swings traffic elsewhere.

“There’s an enormous amount of uncertainty in the world today,” Curtis said. “We see a lot of resilience and sophistication in these DTC ecommerce companies.”

 

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?