Home Brand Aware Your Money Is No Good Here: Why Brands Should Redirect Their Investment From Lookalikes

Your Money Is No Good Here: Why Brands Should Redirect Their Investment From Lookalikes

SHARE:

Brand Aware” explores the data-driven digital ad ecosystem from the marketer’s point of view.

Today’s column is written by Yannis Barros, senior associate, performance marketing, at M.Gemi.

Innovation in audience generation helped build ecommerce brands from the ground up. Think back to when event pixels granted marketers the power to hit prospects similar to past site users, and they ran to the safest option in purchasers.

It was the arrival of the purchaser lookalike audience – a dependable revenue driver.

Third-party attribution tools, however, say otherwise. As of late, the tell-all tools of marketing portfolio efficiency struggle to credit purchaser (or more commonly known as converter) lookalikes.

What prospects are converter lookalikes serving and, furthermore, would these prospects convert without being advertised to?

Marketers raised a similar question against retargeting conversions and their level of incrementality in years past – so much so that today, hold outs and strict budget caps on the tactic are standard practice.

It may be time that converter lookalikes are treated the same way.

Converter lookalike audiences are curated with the attributes of past purchasers, effectively accessing prospects with the highest propensity to purchase. This is not to definitively say that the lookalike has gotten so good that its ads hop in the path of someone about to purchase.

The concept of a converter lookalike alone, nonetheless, is enough to speculate that the targeted prospective audience is past the stage in the consumer journey that marketers presume – past awareness, past consideration and nearer to the bottom of the marketing funnel at the purchase phase, where tactics are more commonly demand-based rather than AI-driven.

Predictive analytics and conversational intelligence fuel the issue. What once were upper and mid-funnel dollars have become short-term, direct response-oriented investments as tech started listening and forecasting more accurately.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Without overly deviating from machine learning tactics to solve for the issue, alternative lookalike audiences will ensure these dollars make their way up the funnel to provide a lift in performance. Add-to-cart and engaged user lookalikes, for example, should receive greater investment as this issue is brought to the light, but make no mistake: The converter lookalike isn’t dead. It’s just far too often serving the incredibly qualified prospect with upper and mid-funnel budget.

Marketers should ration their budgets here more closely, as they do with retargeting, to improve efficiency. Proper reallocation of the savings will more effectively grow their brands in the long term.

Follow M.Gemi (@mgemi) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.