Home Brand Aware The Omni-Channel Paradox

The Omni-Channel Paradox

SHARE:

mayurguptaupdated“Brand Aware” explores the data-driven digital ad ecosystem from the marketer’s point of view.

Today’s column is written by Mayur Gupta, global head of marketing, technology and operations at Kimberly-Clark.

Brands have as much of a chance of driving frictionless omnichannel consumer experiences as a Formula One race car driver trying to win a race on flat tires.

Impossible.

The very model and capabilities used to make the experience omnichannel and seamless is its biggest roadblock. We are trying to create connected experiences using a massively fragmented ecosystem spanning data and technology, agencies and media management, and organizational and operating models.

With all the disruption within the digital landscape putting the consumer at the center and in full control, the consumer has effortlessly become omnichannel while brands still struggle with being multichannel, at best.

Yes, there have been instances of brands enabling connected seamless experiences, but they are far and few, limited to specific campaigns or programs that may have lasted just a few weeks or months, but nothing that is “always on.”

What is preventing this from happening? Fragmentation. It exists in these core areas:

Fragmentation in the data and marketing technology ecosystem

The simplest way to explain this is by looking at one of the many marketing technology infographics, such as the Transit Map from Gartner. This is a great depiction of the innovation that has happened, including the speed at which new startups and capabilities have come to the market.

Yet it also highlights a fragmented and isolated set of technology capabilities that rarely integrate and talk to each other. The data being captured by these technologies is naturally isolated as well. Consumer data is increasingly distributed across paid, owned and earned media, making it impossible for brands to leverage a “universal consumer” perspective that is agnostic of channels, media and data sources.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

mayurchart1 

Fragmentation in agency operations

Brands hire specialized agency partners to manage isolated experiences across media channels. A breakdown of this service offering is a result of a silo approach to handle media and channels. Search management, for example, may be broken down across individual agencies, such as paid, organic and etailer. The media may be managed and optimized separately across paid, owned and earned. Ecommerce is handled outside of the digital scope, while shopper marketing and sales are cut off from digital.

If brands do engage a single agency across channels, the service model within the agencies will enforce a fragmented operating structure. They lack a horizontal cross channel model and perspective that is consumer-focused, as opposed to being channel-focused.

Fragmentation in organizational and operating models

Operating with isolated organizational models across marketing, technology, sales, ecommerce, media and other areas is the most foundational challenge in driving omnichannel experiences. These experiences in many ways are a reflection of how brands are organized. The inability for different units to collaborate and converge is a detriment to seamlessly engaging the consumer across different touch points, especially with the pace at which she jumps from one touch point and channel to the other.

How do you overcome this fragmentation? There may not be a simple answer that works for everyone. At their core, however, organizations need to drive convergence across the entire operating model. That includes all organizational models, data, technology, people skills and capabilities.

In many ways it is adopting a startup mindset where a lack of resources leads to an organizational convergence using three key principles:

1. A consumer-obsessed view 

Converge towards the consumer, making her equally important to all parts of the organization, regardless of their core capability. Driving consumer experiences and owning consumer engagement is no longer just a marketing prerogative. 

mayurchart2

2. From isolation to collaboration

These circles can or should no longer live in isolation. This is true whether it is sales and marketing, marketing and technology, or marketing and finance. Either way, the objectives, drivers and imperatives for all these organizational units are overlapping more than ever before.

mayurchart3

3. Move from T-shaped to Pi-shaped mindsets

The notion of “marketing technologists” is the perfect example to illustrate what I mean: Brands and organizations can no longer win the race with people who have one-track minds. While specialization and deep expertise is key, that knowledge and understanding cannot be compartmentalized in just one area.

Some may argue that this is a bit of an exaggeration, but there is no denying that as the consumer landscape matures, the need for convergence will no longer be an option, but a necessity to survive.

For brands it will be a choice: a fast-paced convergence or gradual loss of market share.

Follow Mayur Gupta (@inspiremartech) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.