Home Agencies IPG’s Arun Kumar: Facebook’s Third-Party Data Clampdown ‘Could’ve Been Handled Better’

IPG’s Arun Kumar: Facebook’s Third-Party Data Clampdown ‘Could’ve Been Handled Better’

SHARE:

Facebook’s decision to shut off partner categories and turn down the spigot of data flowing into and out of its platform may be a necessary step to comply with GDPR and improve consumer privacy.

But Facebook could’ve given partners more notice, rather than wait until two months before GDPR goes into effect, said Arun Kumar, chief marketing and data officer at IPG Mediabrands at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO in San Francisco on Wednesday.

“They should’ve had those conversations with third-parties a year ago,” he said.

Still, agencies should worry less about the removal of data access on Facebook and more about how they’re ethically sourcing, storing and using data in compliance with GDPR, Kumar said.

“It’s a GDPR and a data issue,” he said. “All I’m interested in, whether it’s Facebook or anyone else, is how am I creating segments, and how true are those segments?”

Facebook’s third-party data restrictions likely won’t extend to first-party data matching on its platform as long as that data has been obtained and collected compliantly, Kumar said. Similar data limitations also probably won’t occur on platforms like Google, because they have different partnerships in place than Facebook, and their platforms work differently.

“It’s not a like-for-like comparison,” he said.

But under GDPR, there will be immense pressure for other third parties to get consent. If they struggle to do so, GDPR has the potential to stifle innovation.

“When you have a certain set of rules for people who have resources, investment and capabilities and you prevent smaller players from innovating, I don’t think that serves the interest of the consumer,” he said. “Where is innovation going to come in the market?”

Meanwhile walled gardens have an opportunity to consolidate their data clout under GDPR, suppressing smaller competitors. Kumar suggested regulators should make the cost of implementation the same for everyone by subsidizing smaller players.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“The duopoly has the data and can choose to make it available in certain ways,” Kumar said. “Regulation will make it easier for them to build walls … If you’re going to stifle an industry with regulation you need to be careful.”

Despite these challenges, Kumar thinks GDPR is good for the industry – and will help programmatic deliver on its original promise to make better, more relevant and useful ads, something it’s failed to do because of a focus on driving down prices.

“The two words that drive a lot of decision-making are still volume and price,” he said. “Volume matters, and we’re addicted to low price. Even in programmatic, when you’re negotiating the cost of the tech provider the price still comes through.”

Must Read

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.