Home Agencies Aegis Gets Pants Pulled: Is The Agency Performance Model That Far Away?

Aegis Gets Pants Pulled: Is The Agency Performance Model That Far Away?

SHARE:

Agencies Need PerformanceUK’s Telegraph is reporting that traditional media agency Aegis is being forced to reveal discounts for TV and newspaper ads it bought on behalf of yogurt company Danone in Germany. And you thought they only ate schnitzel in Germany.

So why should you care? Well, if you’re anybody except a vendor caught in a negotiation process with a procurement officer used to working with agencies and requiring full transparency then you could probably care less. In fact, you may love it. Your competitor – the agency working with said procurement officer – is getting rooked.

But, for the agency world, the Aegis example could be a tipping point as they struggle to maintain margins, let alone increase them while procurement pounds away. It’s inevitable that the bow breaks. A little less transparency here, means a little more margin there, and then – poof! Lawsuit.

Aegis will be the loser here and this is why the agency model will change. Performance models that allow arbitrage by agencies (ad networks, too – you know you wanna be an agency!) seems a foregone conclusion. Some will say that the agency model is predicated on the idea that it is the “agent” of its client and once it begins arbitraging in order to make money off of its agency-client relationship, it’s no longer an agent. To this I say, B.S. Agencies were arb-ing the day they were born – most companies do! Clients want performance. Period. To be clear, performance is something that happens on the direct and brand sides of marketing.

The problem for agencies is that they had to let transparency into the process as too many agencies with similar offerings competed for the same client and gave the client the power to open the transparency genie bottle. This transparency led to lower margins for the agency which in the end is killing it. On the other hand, it’s also leading to a new, growing model where performance is key.

Clients need to ask themselves: who’s driving the performance agency bus? These will be the agencies (and ad networks and DSPs!) that survive and thrive in the future.

Of course, could the performance model be commoditized and its margins crushed? If so, then what? Does everything go in-house on the client-side?

Isn’t this fun!?

By John Ebbert

Must Read

How TIME’s CMS Transition Laid The Foundation For Its AI-Driven Content Overhaul

The CMS migration helped unify TIME’s fragmented content data after years of platform transitions under multiple owners. This enabled TIME to launch its own AI search product and convert archival content into AI-friendly “markdown” pages.

Adobe Advertising Just Launched Its Own Custom Algorithms Product

Last week, Adobe Advertising announced the general release of its own Custom Algorithms product, which is “a huge departure from the TubeMogul days,” Erwin Castellanos, GM of Adobe Advertising, tells AdExchanger.

MFA Ad Spend Is Increasing. Is AI Slop To Blame?

This year, the percentage of ad spend going toward made-for-advertising (MFA) sites went up instead of down for the first time since 2023.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Kickbacks Takes An Outsider’s View While Bringing Ads To AI Agents

Andrew McCalip is a founding engineer at Varda Space Industries, where he oversees the manufacturing of things like hypersonic reentry vehicles and satellite buses.

CTV Buyers Are Getting The Show-Level Performance Optimization They’ve Always Wanted

A collaboration between InterMedia Advertising, Peer39 and Pontiac Intelligence provided show-level cost-per-acquisition data for 94% of CTV ad impressions.

Advertisers Await Programmatic Pause Ads

The IAB Tech Lab is working on standardizing programmatic signals for new streaming TV ad formats, including pause ads. Meanwhile, many brands are eager to add pause ads to their repertoire.