Home AdExchanger Talks #NoFilter With Eyeo’s New Chief Product Officer

#NoFilter With Eyeo’s New Chief Product Officer

SHARE:
Vegard Johnsen, chief product officer, eyeo

Is the value exchange fair?

On the surface, sure. Asking people to look at a few ads in exchange for access to free content isn’t an unreasonable request. Otherwise, they’d have to open their wallets and pay.

But the digital advertising industry’s definition of the value exchange also includes the collection and use of consumer data. And there’s an argument to be made that a material distinction exists (or should) between trading attention for free stuff and having one’s activity tracked online.

It’s a valid contention and a topic worthy of debate, says Vegard Johnsen, chief product officer at eyeo – the parent company of Adblock Plus – on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Here’s another question, though: Do people generally get free things in return for nothing?

“Well, no,” Johnsen says. “We go into a shop and we give money in return for goods – [and] the internet isn’t really that different.”

What is different is a person’s level of awareness about the currency they’re typically using to facilitate an online value exchange. (You know, that well-worn adage: If you’re not paying, then you are the product.)

One purported solution is to ask for consent, although that can get out of hand pretty quickly, as anyone who’s been pestered by cookie pop-ups knows.

“Look at GDPR,” Johnsen says. “When you give people choice, which is mandated by law, what you get is a plethora of really annoying questions.”

Eyeo’s whole schtick is predicated on the notion that people aren’t inherently opposed to advertising and sharing data; they just want to be treated with respect. This idea is borne out by the actions of its user base, which overwhelmingly opt to allow sites to serve them ads that meet the Acceptable Ads standard for being non-intrusive.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“People are not against ads,” Johnsen says. “If we look at our users, 94% choose to leave Acceptable Ads on, even though they have an option to turn it off.”

Also in this episode: Why Johnsen moved from director of product management at an advertising juggernaut (Google) to a startup dedicated to ad blocking and filtering, YouTube’s recent crackdown on ad blockers, eyeo’s still controversial reputation in the advertising industry, the sneakiness of smart TV data collection and racing lemons in New Jersey.

Must Read

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

CPG Data Seller SPINS Moves Into Media With MikMak Acquisition

On Wednesday, retail and CPG data company SPINS added a new piece with its acquisition of MikMak, a click-to-buy ad tech and analytics startup that helps optimize their commerce media.

How Valvoline Shifted Marketing Gears When It Became A Pure-Play Retail Brand

Believe it or not, car oil change service company Valvoline is in the midst of a fascinating retail marketing transformation.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

The Big Story: Live From CES 2026

Agents, streamers and robots, oh my! Live from the C-Space campus at the Aria Casino in Las Vegas, our team breaks down the most interesting ad tech trends we saw at CES this year.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

A few years ago, “data clean rooms” were all the ad tech trades could talk about. Fast-forward to 2026, and maybe advertisers don’t need to know what a data clean room is after all.

The AI Search Reckoning Is Dismantling Open Web Traffic – And Publishers May Never Recover

Publishers have been losing 20%, 30% and in some cases even as much as 90% of their traffic and revenue over the past year due to the rise of zero-click AI search.