Home AdExchanger Talks #NoFilter With Eyeo’s New Chief Product Officer

#NoFilter With Eyeo’s New Chief Product Officer

SHARE:
Vegard Johnsen, chief product officer, eyeo

Is the value exchange fair?

On the surface, sure. Asking people to look at a few ads in exchange for access to free content isn’t an unreasonable request. Otherwise, they’d have to open their wallets and pay.

But the digital advertising industry’s definition of the value exchange also includes the collection and use of consumer data. And there’s an argument to be made that a material distinction exists (or should) between trading attention for free stuff and having one’s activity tracked online.

It’s a valid contention and a topic worthy of debate, says Vegard Johnsen, chief product officer at eyeo – the parent company of Adblock Plus – on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Here’s another question, though: Do people generally get free things in return for nothing?

“Well, no,” Johnsen says. “We go into a shop and we give money in return for goods – [and] the internet isn’t really that different.”

What is different is a person’s level of awareness about the currency they’re typically using to facilitate an online value exchange. (You know, that well-worn adage: If you’re not paying, then you are the product.)

One purported solution is to ask for consent, although that can get out of hand pretty quickly, as anyone who’s been pestered by cookie pop-ups knows.

“Look at GDPR,” Johnsen says. “When you give people choice, which is mandated by law, what you get is a plethora of really annoying questions.”

Eyeo’s whole schtick is predicated on the notion that people aren’t inherently opposed to advertising and sharing data; they just want to be treated with respect. This idea is borne out by the actions of its user base, which overwhelmingly opt to allow sites to serve them ads that meet the Acceptable Ads standard for being non-intrusive.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“People are not against ads,” Johnsen says. “If we look at our users, 94% choose to leave Acceptable Ads on, even though they have an option to turn it off.”

Also in this episode: Why Johnsen moved from director of product management at an advertising juggernaut (Google) to a startup dedicated to ad blocking and filtering, YouTube’s recent crackdown on ad blockers, eyeo’s still controversial reputation in the advertising industry, the sneakiness of smart TV data collection and racing lemons in New Jersey.

Must Read

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

Retail Media Is Starting To Come To Grips With The Fact That We All Know Nothing

Retail media is entering what might be called its Socratic phase. The closer we to get to understanding an ad campaign’s real impact and business results, the clearer it is that we have no idea how this thing works.

Meta Reels trending ads

Meta Has New Tools For Brand And Performance Goals, With A Focus On AI (Of Course)

Meta is rolling out Reels trending ads, value rules beyond just conversions, upgrades to Threads and pixel-free landing page optimization.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

Google Search Ads 360 Adds Criteo As First On-Site Retail Media Supply Partner

Criteo announced a partnership with Google Search Ads 360 (SA360), Google’s enterprise search advertising platform, making Criteo the first third-party vendor to integrate with Google for on-site retail media supply.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Minute Media’s Latest Acquisition Brings Automated Content Creation To Its Online Sports Video Network

As display falters, Minute Media is acquiring AI tech that cuts longer-form video content and full-length games into bite-size clips.

With GAM Going Direct To Buyers, SPO Is The New Normal

GAM’s dinner with ad agencies sparked speculation that Google is preparing to spin off its bundled SSP and ad server as a remedy to its ad tech monopoly. But Google says it’s just part of the trend of SSPs going direct to buyers.

Google’s Proposed Fix To Its Ad Tech Monopoly Is At Odds With The DOJ’s Remedies

Late Friday evening, Google filed its proposed remedies to its ad tech monopoly to District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema, and unsurprisingly, they’re rather mild – and very different from what the Department of Justice is looking for.