Home AdExchanger Talks There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

SHARE:
Madan Bharadwaj, founder, M^2

There are a lot of misconceptions about ad measurement.

Some marketers believe media mix modeling is superior to multi-touch attribution or that it’s possible to pinpoint the exact impact of each marketing touch point on sales. (Neither is true.)

But the biggest thing most marketers are wrongheaded about is in thinking there’s a single solution for attribution.

It simply doesn’t exist, says attribution expert Madan Bharadwaj, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

“There is no one technique to rule them all,” says Bharadwaj, who founded M^2 (pronounced M-Squared) in 2022, a measurement startup focused on advanced marketing attribution solutions.

Before that, Bharadwaj co-founded media effectiveness startup Measured and was VP of product management at attribution vendor Visual IQ before the Nielsen acquisition in 2017, where he helped launch the first algorithmic MTA product.

“You have to bring [multiple approaches] together,” he says. “The magic or the mystery is in how it comes together for your brand.”

There’s no single method that can account for all factors because, fundamentally, measuring the effectiveness of advertising is about measuring the complexity of human behavior.

“We can only understand human behavior to a certain level of precision,” Bharadwaj says.

If, for example, you measure the effect of media on behavioral patterns through an incrementality test or if you make estimations through a regression model, like MMM, you will get similar answers, Bharadwaj says, “but not exactly the same answer.”

Which is why marketers should triangulate measurements from multiple sources before making any single investment decision.

“That is an important concept that’s slowly beginning to take root in the industry,” Bharadwaj says, “that there is no one source of truth.”

Also in this episode: Base attribution vs. advanced attribution, whether marketers can trust platform-provided measurement (sort of, not really), how to accurately benchmark media channels. Also: Spitballing attribution-themed cocktail names. (Anyone care for a refreshing “Incrementality on the Beach”?)

For more articles featuring Madan Bharadwaj, click here.

Must Read

CTV Buyers Are Getting The Show-Level Performance Optimization They’ve Always Wanted

A collaboration between InterMedia Advertising, Peer39 and Pontiac Intelligence provided show-level cost-per-acquisition data for 94% of CTV ad impressions.

Advertisers Await Programmatic Pause Ads

The IAB Tech Lab is working on standardizing programmatic signals for new streaming TV ad formats, including pause ads. Meanwhile, many brands are eager to add pause ads to their repertoire.

Why Media Mergers And Spin-Offs Don’t Always Keep Their Promises

With media megamergers, acquisitions and spin-offs left and right, the media landscape is changing at a pace that is difficult to keep up with.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
TransUnion is partnering with Blockgraph so that advertisers can use its identity data to target, reach and measure TV households across channels.

How This Disaster Relief Nonprofit Tapped First-Party Data To Reach Donors Year-Round

Staying top of mind for potential donors is an ongoing challenge for Direct Relief. Nexxen’s audience curation helped it spread and sustain awareness.

Why Major UK Publishers Are Finally Joining Forces To Curate Ad Inventory

Atria’s collective approach is a response to growing monetization challenges and the need to protect the value of human journalism in the AI era.

Toronto Canada pride parade includes a crowd waving pride flags

Ad Performance And Politics Steered Brand Dollars Away From LGBTQ+ Communities – But The Pendulum Will Swing Back

The current administration has discouraged many marketers and organizations from showing support for the LGBTQ+ community, including during Pride month.