Home AdExchanger Talks There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

SHARE:
Madan Bharadwaj, founder, M^2

There are a lot of misconceptions about ad measurement.

Some marketers believe media mix modeling is superior to multi-touch attribution or that it’s possible to pinpoint the exact impact of each marketing touch point on sales. (Neither is true.)

But the biggest thing most marketers are wrongheaded about is in thinking there’s a single solution for attribution.

It simply doesn’t exist, says attribution expert Madan Bharadwaj, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

“There is no one technique to rule them all,” says Bharadwaj, who founded M^2 (pronounced M-Squared) in 2022, a measurement startup focused on advanced marketing attribution solutions.

Before that, Bharadwaj co-founded media effectiveness startup Measured and was VP of product management at attribution vendor Visual IQ before the Nielsen acquisition in 2017, where he helped launch the first algorithmic MTA product.

“You have to bring [multiple approaches] together,” he says. “The magic or the mystery is in how it comes together for your brand.”

There’s no single method that can account for all factors because, fundamentally, measuring the effectiveness of advertising is about measuring the complexity of human behavior.

“We can only understand human behavior to a certain level of precision,” Bharadwaj says.

If, for example, you measure the effect of media on behavioral patterns through an incrementality test or if you make estimations through a regression model, like MMM, you will get similar answers, Bharadwaj says, “but not exactly the same answer.”

Which is why marketers should triangulate measurements from multiple sources before making any single investment decision.

“That is an important concept that’s slowly beginning to take root in the industry,” Bharadwaj says, “that there is no one source of truth.”

Also in this episode: Base attribution vs. advanced attribution, whether marketers can trust platform-provided measurement (sort of, not really), how to accurately benchmark media channels. Also: Spitballing attribution-themed cocktail names. (Anyone care for a refreshing “Incrementality on the Beach”?)

For more articles featuring Madan Bharadwaj, click here.

Must Read

Micro1 Wants Human Domain Experts To Profit From AI And LLMs

Much like the ecosystem of life that surrounds a blue whale, a market of AI SaaS vendors is springing up around the biggest AI companies. And AI data startup Micro1 is emblematic of the shifting nature of these early-stage AI vendors.

How Programmatic Home Screen Ads Are Becoming More Standardized (And More Accessible)

How long does it take you to decide what to watch after you turn your TV on?

Nielsen’s Latest Updates Aim To Remove Bias From Its Measurement Strategy

Just in time for new TV programming to hit the screens in September, Nielsen is rolling out a few upgrades to its video measurement currency that will go live by the end of August

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Agency Black Box Is Breaking. Horizon Media’s Bob Lord Explains Why

According to Horizon Media’s Bob Lord, most agencies are trying to solve the wrong problem by obsessing over cost efficiency at a time when AI has quietly unlocked something far more valuable: the ability to become a growth partner to advertisers.

Taking A Look At Tuple, A New Entrant To The Ossified DSP Market

Tuple is entering the DSP market at a strange and tense moment for third-party ad tech. “There’s just so much animosity” between the programmatic buy and sell sides, says Founder and CEO Doug Lauretano.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

AppLovin’s Play To Reach Non-Gaming Advertisers

Gaming apps are filled with ads for more gaming apps. Why not other advertisers? We go inside AppLovin’s play to bring non-gaming advertisers into the fold.