Home AdExchanger Talks There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

SHARE:
Madan Bharadwaj, founder, M^2

There are a lot of misconceptions about ad measurement.

Some marketers believe media mix modeling is superior to multi-touch attribution or that it’s possible to pinpoint the exact impact of each marketing touch point on sales. (Neither is true.)

But the biggest thing most marketers are wrongheaded about is in thinking there’s a single solution for attribution.

It simply doesn’t exist, says attribution expert Madan Bharadwaj, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

“There is no one technique to rule them all,” says Bharadwaj, who founded M^2 (pronounced M-Squared) in 2022, a measurement startup focused on advanced marketing attribution solutions.

Before that, Bharadwaj co-founded media effectiveness startup Measured and was VP of product management at attribution vendor Visual IQ before the Nielsen acquisition in 2017, where he helped launch the first algorithmic MTA product.

“You have to bring [multiple approaches] together,” he says. “The magic or the mystery is in how it comes together for your brand.”

There’s no single method that can account for all factors because, fundamentally, measuring the effectiveness of advertising is about measuring the complexity of human behavior.

“We can only understand human behavior to a certain level of precision,” Bharadwaj says.

If, for example, you measure the effect of media on behavioral patterns through an incrementality test or if you make estimations through a regression model, like MMM, you will get similar answers, Bharadwaj says, “but not exactly the same answer.”

Which is why marketers should triangulate measurements from multiple sources before making any single investment decision.

“That is an important concept that’s slowly beginning to take root in the industry,” Bharadwaj says, “that there is no one source of truth.”

Also in this episode: Base attribution vs. advanced attribution, whether marketers can trust platform-provided measurement (sort of, not really), how to accurately benchmark media channels. Also: Spitballing attribution-themed cocktail names. (Anyone care for a refreshing “Incrementality on the Beach”?)

For more articles featuring Madan Bharadwaj, click here.

Must Read

The Trade Desk’s Revenue Growth Stalls As Big Brands Tighten Their Belts

“Our revenue growth is below our expectations and below the standard we hold ourselves to,” The Trade Desk CEO Jeff Green told investors.

Comic: Measuremints

Nielsen Is Acquiring DoubleVerify For $2.15 Billion

On Thursday, Nielsen entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DoubleVerify in an all cash transaction valued at approximately $2.15 billion.

WBD Hopes To Buoy Linear TV Long Enough For Streaming To Find Its Way

Warner Bros. Discovery cited softer ad sales growth and the continued decline of linear TV as its reasons for missing investor expectations in Q2. Unsurprisingly, streaming ads are the biggest bright spot on WBD’s earnings report card.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Mobile Freight Train

AppLovin Asks For Patience As It Grows Its Ecommerce And Consumer Ads Business

“We’re deemed a new bucket, so a testing category,” AppLovin CEO told investors regarding its nascent consumer and ecommerce ads business. “And to graduate up takes time. This stuff compounds over quarters and years.”

Magnite Doesn’t Want To Be A DSP. It Just Wants To Own The Decisioning Layer

On Wednesday, Magnite CEO Michael Barrett painted a picture of a company that’s edging into the buy side by adding more DSP-style capabilities for planning and activation.

For Cuisinart, AI-Generated Ads Are As Handy As A Kitchen Blender

Cuisinart’s marketing team has been eager to take advantage of generative AI-based creative.