Home Ad Exchange News TV Data Goes Opt-In: FTC Penalizes Vizio For ‘Unfair And Deceptive’ Data Collection

TV Data Goes Opt-In: FTC Penalizes Vizio For ‘Unfair And Deceptive’ Data Collection

SHARE:

ftc-vizioTelevision viewing data is sensitive. And because consumers don’t expect such data to be collected, smart-TV manufacturer Vizio was penalized for doing so without an opt-in.

Vizio paid the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) $2.2 million to settle charges over its data collection practices on Monday. The settlement requires that Vizio delete its old data and get an affirmative opt-in for future data collection.

“In our complaint, we have alleged that TV viewing information is sensitive data that requires an opt-in for collection and sharing, much like other categories of sensitive information including health and financial information, children’s information and precise geolocation,” FTC attorney Kevin Moriarty told AdExchanger.

Although FTC settlements only apply to the company being disciplined, in this case Vizio, the ruling is likely to be interpreted by other TV manufacturers dabbling in data collection that TV viewing data requires an opt-in.

“This settlement … makes clear that smart-TV makers should get people’s consent before collecting and sharing television viewing information,” Moriarty added in a blog post about the settlement.

Other TV manufacturers may already comply. When ProPublica broke the news about Vizio’s data collection in November 2015, it mentioned that Samsung and LG Electronics only collected data after receiving an opt-in.

What got Vizio in trouble was not only the type of data it collected, but that it did so in an “unfair and deceptive” way – practices the FTC watches over closely.

When users activated Vizio’s “Smart Interactivity” feature that collected their data, they were promised offers and suggestions, but not told how data would be collected and why. That created what the FTC characterized as a misleading opt-in.

Plus, the data collected from consumers was ruled too sensitive.

Vizio used automated content recognition to track what programs and ads a consumer watched across cable, broadband, set-top boxes, DVDs, streaming devices and on-air broadcasts. And Vizio appended that data to include sex, age, income, marital status, household size, education level, home ownership and household value, according to an FTC release.

The company then sold that data. Multiple class-action lawsuits name WPP Group, Interpublic Group, Tapad, Xaxis, TubeMogul and Visible World as companies receiving that data. Those lawsuits, which will proceed separately from the FTC settlement, hinge on an interpretation of the Video Privacy Protection Act, a law that prevented video rental companies from selling data about movie rental history.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

The timing of the settlement means the investigation began under outgoing FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. But the incoming chairwoman, Maureen K. Ohlhausen, voted in favor of the settlement. Her statement about the Vizio settlement, though, suggests that she may use a different set of criteria for future cases.

“There may be good policy reasons to consider such information [individualized television viewing activity] sensitive,” Ohlhausen said. “We must determine whether the practice causes substantial injury that is not reasonably avoidable by the consumer and is not outweighed by benefits to competition or consumers,” she continued, saying that she would launch an effort in the coming weeks to examine this issue further.

On the business side, this settlement ironically may pave the way for the advanced TV space to develop, according to a source who partners with Vizio around its data. The source didn’t want to be named because it could violate a nondisclosure agreement.

“I don’t expect this to massively affect Vizio’s ability to collect TV data long-term,” the source said. “With this behind us now, we expect a lot more growth in the business together.”

Update: Vizio sent a statement in response to the settlement to AdExchanger. Vizio said that it never matched viewing data with any personally identifiable information (PII). Vizio also said that it updated its disclosures prior to the settlement.

And the smart TV manufacturer confirmed that opt-in will be the norm for TV data collection. “Today, the FTC has made clear that all smart TV makers should get people’s consent before collecting and sharing television viewing information and Vizio now is leading the way,” Vizio General Counsel Jerry Huang said.

Must Read

Pacvue Enters The Next Chapter Of Retail Media With New CEO Rahul Choraria

Pacvue has promoted COO Rahul Choraria to chief executive.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.