Home The Sell Sider Privacy Initiatives Make Publishers’ First-Party Data More Valuable Than Ever

Privacy Initiatives Make Publishers’ First-Party Data More Valuable Than Ever

SHARE:

The Sell Sider is a column written for the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Radmir Nasyrov, CEO at Roxot.

I believe Apple’s Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP), ITP 2.0, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation and similar privacy initiatives will change programmatic advertising as we know it today.

In a cookie-less environment, advertisers can’t personalize ads to specific users. Therefore, the value offered by programmatic advertising compared to other advertising channels will be lost.

With the tremendous reallocation of marketing budgets, publishers will suffer the most. Index Exchange’s Andrew Casale delivered a keynote speech last May where he said ad requests without a buyer ID, or a unique key used for matching users, receive 99% lower bids than the same ad request with the identifier. That points to significant loss in programmatic revenue if all ad requests lack cookie or user ID.

More recently, Google’s Sean Downey commented at Industry Preview that he’s seen statistics indicating that publishers’ CPMs may be cut in half due to ITP.

Currently, only Safari restricts third-party cookies by default. Mozilla is planning to join the trend in the near future. In the eyes of a publisher, Safari and Firefox users become similar to users with ad blockers: They consume publishers’ content but do not generate ad revenue that publishers can rely on. Safari and Firefox combined make up 16% of US desktop traffic and 50% of mobile traffic, according to StatCounter Global Stats.

New privacy-protecting initiatives created a scarcity on the market that publishers can take advantage of to cover potential losses.

Publishers need to focus on maximizing their inventory value. With Safari and Firefox users going dark for advertisers, more of their budgets will be attributed to trackable users. Packaging premium placements only with Chrome users and pricing them accordingly may be a successful tactic in the near term.

Despite the significant revenue loss in the short-term, there could be a path for publishers to move back toward their strong position in the market. Publishers’ first-party data about user interests and behavior may become a main form of targeting for advertisers. Using key-value pairs to segment audiences by their demographics and content consumed, publishers can offer buyers a new source of reliable audience data. This approach would eliminate unnecessary middlemen and attribute more value and, therefore, revenue to publishers.

However, first-party audience data needs to be standardized and passed in ad requests to become a dominant form of behavioral targeting. This solution, like any other, requires collaboration of all parties within the ecosystem, including publishers, ad tech vendors, buyers and regulators.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Even considering that advertisers now pay more attention to the context they buy ads against, I have no doubt that programmatic advertising will continue to rely on some kind of user identification. That’s essential for brands and advertisers to establish effective communication with potential and existing customers. 

Follow Roxot (@roxot_team) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.