Home The Sell Sider Consumers Are Running To Mobile Apps – Why Are Marketers Holding Back?

Consumers Are Running To Mobile Apps – Why Are Marketers Holding Back?

SHARE:
Steve Roach, head of mobile app sales at Index Exchange

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Steve Roach, head of mobile app sales at Index Exchange.

On average, consumers are spending 4.8 hours per day on their smartphones, using up to 80 apps.

Despite massive consumption, however, brand marketers are still hesitant to lean into a mobile-first approach, particularly in programmatic.

But with the mobile app economy predicted to grow to $156 billion by 2023, why the uncertainty?

Today, the digital advertising industry has the opportunity to transform the mobile app channel by acknowledging, understanding and tackling marketers’ concerns.

The app supply chain needs more transparency

Many existing issues come down to a misunderstanding of the app supply chain – an area where the programmatic industry can help.

The app supply chain looks much like a waterfall with a series of chained SDKs that all have different preferential access to media. Within this structure, brands and agencies buying app inventory programmatically don’t have insight into where in the waterfall they’re buying. 

If the paradigm within the app space doesn’t reflect an environment where brands get priority and access to the best of the bunch, there’s an understandable level of caution. The silver lining is that our industry is making progress, specifically with the launch of Prebid Mobile 2.0, an independent SDK that enables mobile header bidding and end-to-end ad rendering.

It’s also important brands understand the fees taken during the ad delivery process and who is taking them. Before they can be confident in their app strategy, brands will need a higher level of traceability within transaction data, fees and costs across the supply chain.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

SDK standardization is needed

SDKs are used to facilitate many useful activities for app developers. Everything from open measurement to addressability to creative rendering can be facilitated by an SDK. While this has led to innovation and produced novel creative units, it’s also created inefficiencies. 

It’s common for an app to deploy as many as a dozen SDKs. If each SDK requires different assets to render a unique style of creative, the ability for a brand to scale across the app ecosystem becomes limited.

We are at this point in the app ecosystem where commonalities are emerging, which makes it possible to create standards. Codifying requirements into future versions of openRTB protocols could lead us to a path where opportunities like creative rendering move out of proprietary SDKs and into shared SDKs.

Control of the ad experience is required

It’s very common for mobile marketers to advertise their own apps in similar apps. This is not nearly as common in any other media channel – you don’t see ads for Netflix in Hulu. Brands need the ability to maintain control over their ad experience as it moves through the supply chain to a consumer’s mobile device.

If brands have little understanding and control over the ad experience, they’re unable to ensure positive brand reputation and risk negative association with their content. It will take time to ease out of this paradigm, but carving out premium slots reserved just for brands is a step in the right direction.

In order for brands to buy confidently in-app, ad tech platforms and app developers alike must prioritize marketer needs and address the gaps that persist. As an industry, we have the tools available to transcend the roadblocks and bring transparency to the supply chain, demystify complexity and earn a greater share of marketers’ increasingly scrutinized media budgets.

Follow Index Exchange (@IndexExchange) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.