Home Publishers Can China Develop Viewability Standards?

Can China Develop Viewability Standards?

SHARE:

Chinese advertisers want viewability standards – but the country’s unique media landscape offers unusual challenges.

“There is definitely a growing concern among advertisers here about wasted media budget and the transparency of their media buying,” said Martin Zhang, CEO and founder of Shanghai-based verification firm Adbug.

Zhang is also chair of a Mobile Marketing Association China subcommittee tasked with developing guidelines for brand safety, traffic quality and viewability.

Members include publishers like Tencent, advertisers such as P&G and Unilever, agencies and ad tech companies, including Sizmek, fraud detection company RTB Asia and iPinyou, a DSP in Beijing.

Rather than reinventing the wheel, the group, which started work in early January, is leaning toward adopting the Interactive Advertising Bureau’s definition of viewability – 50% of pixels in view for at least one second for display, 30% of pixels for really large display ads and 50% of pixels in view for two continuous seconds for video.

Although the basic concept of viewability is pretty much the same anywhere in the world, the IAB rules will have to be modified to suit the particular needs of the China market, said Adbug EVP Summer Han.

For example, large premium publishers in China don’t allow third-party JavaScript to run on their sites, and that “makes viewability detection virtually impossible, especially on premium inventory,” said Andy Fan, CEO and founder of RTB Asia.

If viewability detection is going to work in these “technically ‘closed’” publisher environments, the members of the group will have to compromise, Fan said.

The way ads are bought in China also presents a challenge to the creation of viewability standards, Han said.

“In China, there are still many companies buying on a CPD, or cost-per-day, basis,” she said. “And from our past experience, the viewability rate in those cases can be as low as 2%.”

When advertisers buy on a CPD model, they’re doing so because a publisher has said its site receives a certain amount of traffic overall. And that motivates publishers to buy as much traffic as they can, which is a short hop, skip and jump away from the fraud problem.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

There isn’t all that much incentive for a publisher to integrate with a third-party verification partner if the only result will be an unmasking of their metrics.

“In China, viewability and fraud are very connected,” Han said. “And that’s what we’re also trying to address in the group.”

The committee is also hammering out a protocol to address brand safety issues, some of which are universal – pornography, airline and car accidents and the like – and some of which are decidedly China-specific, like food safety, politics, content that is disrespectful of the elderly and hentai, or pornographic Japanese anime.

Food safety is a really big one, though. In 2008, an enormous scandal erupted in China involving milk and baby formula being cut with a chemical called melamine. Anyone who could afford it began buying their formula overseas.

“There is a lot of content that includes the Chinese word for that chemical,” Han said. “It might be mentioned in just one sentence, but brands don’t want their ads for baby formula anywhere near it.”

For the moment, the working group is still in the information collection, fact-finding and discussion phase. There is no specific deadline set for when the standards will be ready for public consumption, and “most members feel that this matter is important but not urgent,” Fan said, and that it’s “better moving forward with a lot of caution” to make sure they get it right.

But the group will have to take an extra step that its Western counterparts didn’t have to consider: approval by the Chinese government, whose blessing is required before any standard is considered official.

MMA China is itself a member of another industry association in China whose name translates to “China Digital Marketing Service Industry Alliance,” which is well-versed in liaising with government entities. A draft of the standard will be sent to Gongxinbu, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

Government approvals aside, however, Zhang envisions an accelerated timeline. Large international brands are driving the conversation.

“For one, this is an international movement led by the US and global advertisers like P&G and Unilever that are asking agencies and publishers in China about viewability measurement and third-party vendors,” Zhang said. “And we also have existing guidelines from the IAB and the MRC to lead us. We just need to figure out what fits for China and have advertisers and publishers agree on it.”

The buy side is all-in. But are publishers in China really ready to sell on viewability? The jury is still out, said Sammi Gong, China country manager at MMA China, but the ball is rolling all the time.

“This is a whole new market, and I can’t say if we’re truly ready or not,” she said. “But the fact is that it’s happening right now.”

Must Read

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure to create an isolated computing environment for ad targeting and measurement. It will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.