Home Platforms Efficient Frontier Announces Its Demand-Side Platform; Adds Display Media Buying Capabilities To Its Search Platform

Efficient Frontier Announces Its Demand-Side Platform; Adds Display Media Buying Capabilities To Its Search Platform

SHARE:

Efficient FrontierEfficient Frontier announced that it was getting in the demand-side platform game by adding a display media buying component to its paid search buying platform. According to the release, “The new display offering includes real-time bidding capabilities, which is dynamic bidding at the impression level, as well as a proven portfolio approach to optimization.” Read more.

Justin Merickel is the VP of Marketing and New Product Development at Efficient Frontier and discussed the company’s new search and display initiatives.

AdExchanger.com: Initially, where do you see the sweet spot for offering cross-platform (display and search) targeting?  Any verticals in particular?

JM: Our focus is on performance marketers who are using search and display to garner a measurable ROI.  Since launch we have been focused on working with our client base where we have significant concentrations in finance, education, autos, travel, and retail.  We are now working with a few companies that are not existing search clients who today only leverage the display aspects of our platform.  These clients still align with our performance orientation.

How big is the display ad education challenge for EF in relation to its seach marketing clientele?  Any methodology you can share for educating the search masses?

There is some education on the exchanges and the unique characteristics of display optimization.  Impression characteristics like frequency and ad-size are not really part of the optimization equation in search marketing.  That being said, search clients are very comfortable with auction marketplaces and optimizing to ROI.  In fact, there is a trend at many clients where the search team is absorbing ownership for the performance side of display.

Of existing display and search clients, how does monthly spend breakout between display and search on average per client?  How do you expect this to evolve? 50/50 someday?

The break-out between search and display is variable depending on the type of client, target audience, and scope of campaign.  That being said, today the monthly break-out in spend in our platform for clients using us for both search and display is around 90% search, 10% display.  We do see this spend ratio scaling rapidly in favor of display as the exchange market matures.

Can you talk about the attribution capabilities of the EF display/search platform?  For example, how do you handle viewthroughs in both display -and even search?

In managing and optimizing both search and display we capture a very robust set of ad interaction data.  Additionally, our clients use our tags to capture and deliver to us the post-click and post-view data that is critical to optimization.  As a result of this extensive data capture, we have incredibly detailed information about campaign performance that is seamlessly connected for analysis in our platform.

Today, our default attribution setting is last click.  We give clients the flexibility to define a view through credit in the absence of a last click. And, of course, we provide the ability to apply a unique look-back window for click and view conversions.  On the roadmap is a more flexible, multi-stage attribution credit that can assign credit to multiple ad interactions that precede a conversion.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

One interesting trend is that our clients find so much value in the unified campaign analysis that we are beginning to leverage our ad-serving for premium display buys outside of the exchange.  In serving premium campaigns, our attribution spans 100% of their display and search buys.  While the Efficient Frontier technology will only optimize biddable display, our clients are leveraging the analysis to inform premium buying with a deeper understanding of how search and display interact.

By John Ebbert

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

A few years ago, “data clean rooms” were all the ad tech trades could talk about. Fast-forward to 2026, and maybe advertisers don’t need to know what a data clean room is after all.

The AI Search Reckoning Is Dismantling Open Web Traffic – And Publishers May Never Recover

Publishers have been losing 20%, 30% and in some cases even as much as 90% of their traffic and revenue over the past year due to the rise of zero-click AI search.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

No Waiting for May – CES Is Where The TV Upfront Season Starts 

If any single event can be considered the jumping-off point for TV upfronts, it’s the Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES), which kicks off this week in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Comic: This Is Our Year

Comic: This Is Our Year

It’s been 15 years since this comic first ran in January 2011, and there’s something both quaint and timeless about it. Here’s to more (and more) transparency in 2026, and happy New Year!

From AI To SPO: The Top 10 AdExchanger Guest Columns Of 2025

The generative AI trend generated endless hot takes this year, but the ad industry also had plenty to say about growing competition between DSPs and SSPs. Here are AdExchanger’s top 10 most popular guest columns of 2025 and why they resonated.