Home Online Advertising This Is What Caused Meta’s Overspending Glitch

This Is What Caused Meta’s Overspending Glitch

SHARE:

Over the weekend, an error in Meta’s ad management system caused an enormous headache for advertisers.

By some estimates, Meta’s automated systems overspent on overpriced inventory by tens of millions of dollars during the early hours of Sunday morning across Facebook and the Audience Network.

Meta has acknowledged through sales reps that the issue stemmed, at least in part, from the web-to-app optimization product, according to four advertisers who spoke to AdExchanger. But that misfire was coupled with other problems, including the failure of cost-capping controls, which are the rules advertisers set for what they’ll pay for a given impression or conversion. Something also went wrong with Meta’s bidding tech since near-worthless impressions were selling at huge CPMs.

Beyond a failure of its systems, Meta has also failed to mount an effective response to the issue, leaving advertisers confused about the details and unclear on whether they’ll receive refunds.

The platform has been experiencing ad-related glitches since last year, including issues with its attribution technology and customer service issues in the wake of mass layoffs.

This most recent problem is rather complicated because it involves an understanding of the minutiae of how the Meta ad platform is used.

Why daily budget is so much more

Advertisers typically set relatively high daily budget caps.

If you sell bedding and Matthew McConaughey happens to mention in a TV interview that he loves your pillowcases, there’s going to be a flood of traffic that converts at a very high rate.

Advertisers therefore can’t treat daily budget caps as the amount they intend to spend on a given day because you could go viral on TikTok and get so many cost-effective conversions that you still end up blowing past your daily budget.

In that case, do you want an arbitrary rule in place that pulls the brakes when unexpected magic happens?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

At least, that’s how Meta would no doubt frame it.

Advertisers balance high daily budget caps with very tight cost cap controls. A brand might have a rule saying it will pay no more than $20.80 per conversion. And because there aren’t that many people who convert at that price, brands can effectively keep their daily budgets much lower than the budget cap.

Past the cap

Sunday’s glitch was partially tied to a malfunction of Meta’s app-to-web optimization tool.

But Meta also stopped applying cost-capping controls, which caused advertisers to quickly reach and then exceed their daily budgets by 25%.

This is only supposed to happen during a perfect storm of terrific earned media and effective marketing, whereby conversions are pouring in at profitable rates. Yet, on Sunday, it happened for no reason.

Many ecommerce merchants and SMB advertisers treat the daily budget cap as an amount they’d “be uncomfortable paying” even if they knew they were making money on the incoming sales, which is how one agency CEO explained it to AdExchanger.

The cap can be 10 to 20 times what an account would budget for the day, even on a high-spending day.

One advertiser with a $50,000 daily budget cap typically spends $2,000 to $3,000 on Meta ads on a Sunday, per data shown to AdExchanger. He said if the daily report on Monday showed a $5,000 spend from the day before, the brand would look into what the spike was about.

This past Sunday, he checked his phone at 9 a.m. to see frantic messages from the social media agency, because the account had spent $60,000 that morning and there were no conversion metrics or site traffic to speak of.

If the business reached its $50,000 daily budget threshold with the cost caps applied, the marketer said they would expect hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash flow to be following close behind, because the campaign should be converting sales only at the pre-set rates. Now, there’s just a $60,000 hole in the budget.

Meta’s ad system is authorized to spend up to 125% of an advertiser’s daily budget, said one agency exec. But because of the nature of this error, Meta has now captured a huge chunk of its advertisers’ liquid funds.

For many small- and medium-sized businesses in particular, Meta overspending their caps has put them in a major payment bind. They would only have spent that much on ads with the expectation of large checks rolling in shortly thereafter.

“This is much worse than, ‘Oh, crud, a day with no ROI,’” the agency exec said. “Thousands of Meta small business advertisers are now in, like, ‘Rent or groceries this month?’ mode, and it’s not OK.”

Must Read

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.