Home Online Advertising Rubicon SEC Filing: Chango’s 2014 Revenues Were $43M, But Retargeting Firm Wasn’t Profitable

Rubicon SEC Filing: Chango’s 2014 Revenues Were $43M, But Retargeting Firm Wasn’t Profitable

SHARE:

rubicon-changoChango recorded 2014 revenues of $43 million prior to its acquisition by Rubicon Project, according to a new US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing.

But the company was not profitable, despite being an early player in the lucrative retargeting niche. It reported a loss of just under $1 million for the year. Read the 8-K.

Chango offers website and search retargeting capabilities to a customer list that includes 60 marketers in the Fortune 500. In Q2 it sold to Rubicon for $122 million in cash and stock, representing a roughly 3x multiple on the 2014 revenue figure reported Friday.

The lack of profitability for 7-year-old Chango shows just how tough it can be to make a late-stage ad tech startup succeed at a time when venture capital is hard to come by for firms focused on display ad tech. (Startups focused on TV/video, commerce and mobile appear to be having an easier time, as evidenced by new rounds for firms like ISpot.tv, Purch and Altitude Digital.)

Rubicon’s filing gets to the heart of the challenge for late-stage DSPs and ad networks. Chango’s cost of revenue, including data and media costs, totaled $25 million in 2014, or more than half of total revenue. Meanwhile sales and marketing costs were $13 million, and technology and development costs were $3 million.

If that were all of the company’s expenses, Chango might have squeezed out a slight $1 million profit, but the smallest line item of them all – $3 million worth of general and administrative costs – put the company into the red for the year.

Its acquisition brought Rubicon more firmly into the buy-side arena with offerings geared to the agency and marketer buyer. While Rubicon already had a fully featured demand-side platform, Chango brought considerable customer scale along with about 150 employees to serve those clients.

The deal followed Rubicon’s acquisition of iSocket and ShinyAds, two platforms for deal automation that cost less than $30 million cumulatively. The tiny deal price suggested that the programmatic “orders” business was more nascent than some had thought, but Rubicon is making some progress.

In Q1 2015, CEO Frank Addante said this part of Rubicon’s business was 15% of overall managed revenue, up from 13% in the fourth quarter.

Corrected: An earlier version incorrectly presumed Chango’s numbers were in US currency. Story has been updated. 

Must Read

AppsFlyer and Roku’s New SRN Integration Will Shed Light On CTV Campaign Impact

Roku and AppsFlyer announced the launch of a new self-reporting network (SRN) integration between both companies, which will allow mobile app advertisers to more effectively measure their streaming video campaigns

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

DOJ v. Google: How Judge Brinkema Seems To Be Thinking After Week One

Where the DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial stands after one week’s worth of remedies arguments.

Swish, A Company That's Bringing Programmatic to Product Sampling, Announces Seed Funding

Swish, a startup that partners with retailers to provide product full-size CPG samples to people doing their grocery shopping online, announces $2.3 million in seed funding.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

DOJ v. Google: During Opening Arguments, The DOJ And Google Battle Over An AdX Divestiture

Court is back in session. And the fate of  the open internet is in the balance.

Chris Mufarrige, director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC

FTC Consumer Protection Chief: No Easy Answers On Privacy, ‘Only Trade-Offs’

Privacy isn’t black-and-white, says the FTC’s Chris Mufarrige, promising evidence-driven consumer protection cases under the Trump administration.

How Encryption Keys Could Resolve The TID Furor

Rather than sharing universal TIDs that any DSP or curator can access, Raptive says publishers should instead share encrypted TIDs with an encryption key provided only to trusted demand-side partners.