Home Online Advertising GroupM Search CEO Copeland Reviews Local Ads: Brands, Search-Display And Facebook’s Impact

GroupM Search CEO Copeland Reviews Local Ads: Brands, Search-Display And Facebook’s Impact

SHARE:

GroupMRecently, GroupM Search made available a new, 8-page white paper titled, “Perception vs. Execution: Examination of Brands’ Local Business Strategies Reveals Gaps to Act On.” The agency says that its “a gap in what national advertisers perceive they’re doing in the local digital space and what they’re actually doing.” GroupM says that local digital spending is expected to increase by 18% by 2012, with local online spend projected to surpass all other channels by 2015. See the paper.

Chris Copeland is CEO of GroupM Search,  the specialist search engine marketing division within WPP’s GroupM. He discussed the implications of the findings with AdExchanger.

AdExchanger: Beyond geo-targeting, what other optimization tactics can a search marketer use to address the capture of local intent?

CC: Given that Google now allows campaign settings to capture searches based on intent, utilizing those tools is now a more essential part of a paid search campaign.  Also, incorporating ad extensions related to local are important to local intent in search.  For example, connecting local-oriented campaigns with Google Places accounts for both location ad extensions and/or phone ad extensions are strong local intent moves.  Additionally, many brands may not have fully-optimized mobile sites and search marketers may not be utilizing mobile ads because of this.  However, by connecting mobile campaigns to Google Places accounts, search marketers can utilize the click-to-call only ad extension, thereby bypassing the need to send traffic to mobile sites and capturing that mobile-local intent search traffic.

Does “brand” need to be localized for every market?  If so, to what extent?

It’s funny that this question is never really asked of brick-and-mortar locations.  Online local is simply the digital reflection of what is done in a brand’s physical locations.  If a brand “localizes” their brick-and-mortar locations, the same considerations, tactics and practices need to be done with their digital locations, especially on sites such as Google Places and Bing/MSN local where the tactics (full optimization of listing, couponing, etc.) are still free.

What are your thoughts on how Facebook will impact local?

With more than 800 million users and the continuing influence of social media in general, Facebook naturally has a large impact on local.  Facebook’s own stats show that while national brand pages make up 6% of all Facebook pages, local business pages make up 18% of all Facebook pages.  Local business engagement on Facebook outnumbers national engagement by 3-to-1.  Facebook is successful because it is personal and relevant.  Additionally, all of the major search engines are now using social signals and citations in their search results, making social engagement more important than ever.

On the agency side, what are the keys to offering effective specialization in local media?

It is key for agencies to understand that local reaches far beyond paid search, but to also realize that non-PPC local efforts are not in competition with paid search efforts. Local digital advertising across various forums should be supplemental and complimentary to paid search.  Secondly, it’s important for agencies to know their client’s business objectives to determine if there is actually a local play for them outside of search because location-based marketing tools are not a fit for every client.  For instance, a tire manufacturer would have a difficult time implementing local tactics as they generally do not directly own or manage storefronts, unless they have a targeted, specialized local objective.  The same goes for an entertainment (media) client, or a client that makes products sold outside of their own sales channel.  Lastly, it is of importance for agencies to develop a holistic plan that encompasses every applicable local tactic, but one that can be implemented in different stages.  Because local digital marketing is relatively new, not all brands are able or desire to take on a large amount of new spend without knowing its direct (and immediate) payoff.

Is there a unique search-display opportunity with local?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Most sites through which display can be bought offer targeting on a local level, but prices may vary depending on how many markets and to what level of targeting a company wants to do.  Facebook offers display ad targeting on a very micro-level, but consensus is mixed on the effectiveness of this type of media on the local ecosystem.  Online local is truly, at its core, about discoverability at the moment of consumer intent and decision.  When a consumer is ready to make a purchase and they are trying to find the location at which to make their purchase, they are typically not surfing the Web looking at display advertising.

Switching to the sell-side, what do you think this data says for the local publisher?  “Local” can be bought through national and global media properties after all.

It’s absolutely correct to suggest local can be bought, but the real question is should it be bought that way. For the immediate future, that’s probably an acceptable behavior. Our view is that the value proposition, over time, can and will get better at a local level. If developed and curated properly the quality of content associated with local publishers can create premium opportunities. Anything short of that, as an aspiration and an ultimate realization, from the publisher side will leave advertisers content to do national deals.

By John Ebbert

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.