Home On TV & Video Why Your Attribution Strategy Is Failing in CTV/OTT – And How To Fix It

Why Your Attribution Strategy Is Failing in CTV/OTT – And How To Fix It

SHARE:

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Today’s column is by TJ Sullivan, EVP of sales at Digital Remedy

As the consumer journey has grown more complex, marketers have been forced to extend campaigns across a diverse ecosystem of devices and platforms. That, in turn, has made attribution much more challenging – particularly in CTV/OTT advertising.

Today, it takes an average of 56 touch points before a consumer makes a purchase. Determining which of those touch points truly sealed the deal feels seemingly impossible. The reality is it likely wasn’t just one exposure. Rather, it was probably a series of carefully timed and curated engagements on specific channels and devices – an experience unique to each consumer.

With only first- and last-touch measurement, advertisers are missing out on the full chain of impressions and how their inter-dependency drove a desired action. 

Enter multi-touch attribution (MTA), the only effective way to fully understand the customer journey. This essential measurement strategy allows marketers to identify the specific touch points throughout the journey on CTV (and beyond!) that triggered a desired action – and then leverage those insights to optimize future campaigns. 

With multi-touch attribution, each touch point or creative may carry a different weight, but all are taken into account. For example, in a time-decay MTA model, credit increases as time to conversion decreases. In a linear MTA model, credit for a conversion is distributed equally across all touch points. Simply put, it paints a fuller picture.

With multichannel content consumption consistently on the rise, marketers need to get smarter about measurement. Supercharge your advertising strategy by leveraging these alternative attribution methodologies.

Step 1: Define your attribution timeframe 

How far back in time can an ad still influence an action? It depends on your brand and goals. Define this timeframe and exclude exposures outside that window. Then, decide how you’ll weigh every touch within it. 

Remember, correlation is not the same as causality. Just because it looks like the conversion was driven by a series of impressions, looks can be deceiving. Maybe that person was a long-standing fan and intended to purchase anyway. Maybe they read an article highlighting your brand, and that PR initiative – completely separate from your CTV ads – ultimately drove them to take action. It’s impossible to know without considering all the factors at play.

Step 2: Get incremental 

Incrementality analysis evaluates attributed conversions and filters out ones the campaign didn’t directly drive. This requires measuring the conversion rate lift of an exposed viewer against a holdout group. In the modern ad landscape, there will be overlap between individuals who saw ads on different mediums. Incrementality allows brands to isolate the effect of a particular media type to accurately determine its impact, measuring which desired actions, such as purchases or site visits, occurred as a direct result of a brand’s campaign or variable within a campaign. 

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

With incrementality analysis eliminating conversions from the measurement model that would have happened anyway, advertisers can see a more accurate reflection of their CTV campaign effectiveness. Without this type of analysis, this channel exists in a vacuum, not as part of a larger, more holistic performance strategy.

Step 3: Optimize in real time

What good is data if you don’t put it to work right away? The beauty of CTV is that it enables real-time optimization of ad buys and delivery in a way linear TV definitely cannot. That means as soon as advertisers have insight into attribution, they should move their budget toward the publishers, creatives, dayparts, audiences and geographies that are working to drive the most action to fully maximize spend.

Sophisticated CTV platforms treat each campaign like real-time A/B tests. For example, if a “millennial women” audience segment is outperforming “Gen Z women” or a 15-second creative is outperforming a 30-second creative, this data is used to inform media buying with a bidder that moves budget toward the highest performing campaign variables – in this case, “millennial women” with that 15-second creative.

While it may be relatively new to some marketers, multi-touch attribution must become a top priority in CTV advertising strategy. By leveraging multi-touch attribution coupled with granular incrementality analysis, advertisers can effectively determine what’s making a true impact – and take swift action to drive higher return on ad spend.

Follow Digital Remedy (@cpxi) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.