Home On TV & Video Why Your Attribution Strategy Is Failing in CTV/OTT – And How To Fix It

Why Your Attribution Strategy Is Failing in CTV/OTT – And How To Fix It

SHARE:

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Today’s column is by TJ Sullivan, EVP of sales at Digital Remedy

As the consumer journey has grown more complex, marketers have been forced to extend campaigns across a diverse ecosystem of devices and platforms. That, in turn, has made attribution much more challenging – particularly in CTV/OTT advertising.

Today, it takes an average of 56 touch points before a consumer makes a purchase. Determining which of those touch points truly sealed the deal feels seemingly impossible. The reality is it likely wasn’t just one exposure. Rather, it was probably a series of carefully timed and curated engagements on specific channels and devices – an experience unique to each consumer.

With only first- and last-touch measurement, advertisers are missing out on the full chain of impressions and how their inter-dependency drove a desired action. 

Enter multi-touch attribution (MTA), the only effective way to fully understand the customer journey. This essential measurement strategy allows marketers to identify the specific touch points throughout the journey on CTV (and beyond!) that triggered a desired action – and then leverage those insights to optimize future campaigns. 

With multi-touch attribution, each touch point or creative may carry a different weight, but all are taken into account. For example, in a time-decay MTA model, credit increases as time to conversion decreases. In a linear MTA model, credit for a conversion is distributed equally across all touch points. Simply put, it paints a fuller picture.

With multichannel content consumption consistently on the rise, marketers need to get smarter about measurement. Supercharge your advertising strategy by leveraging these alternative attribution methodologies.

Step 1: Define your attribution timeframe 

How far back in time can an ad still influence an action? It depends on your brand and goals. Define this timeframe and exclude exposures outside that window. Then, decide how you’ll weigh every touch within it. 

Remember, correlation is not the same as causality. Just because it looks like the conversion was driven by a series of impressions, looks can be deceiving. Maybe that person was a long-standing fan and intended to purchase anyway. Maybe they read an article highlighting your brand, and that PR initiative – completely separate from your CTV ads – ultimately drove them to take action. It’s impossible to know without considering all the factors at play.

Step 2: Get incremental 

Incrementality analysis evaluates attributed conversions and filters out ones the campaign didn’t directly drive. This requires measuring the conversion rate lift of an exposed viewer against a holdout group. In the modern ad landscape, there will be overlap between individuals who saw ads on different mediums. Incrementality allows brands to isolate the effect of a particular media type to accurately determine its impact, measuring which desired actions, such as purchases or site visits, occurred as a direct result of a brand’s campaign or variable within a campaign. 

With incrementality analysis eliminating conversions from the measurement model that would have happened anyway, advertisers can see a more accurate reflection of their CTV campaign effectiveness. Without this type of analysis, this channel exists in a vacuum, not as part of a larger, more holistic performance strategy.

Step 3: Optimize in real time

What good is data if you don’t put it to work right away? The beauty of CTV is that it enables real-time optimization of ad buys and delivery in a way linear TV definitely cannot. That means as soon as advertisers have insight into attribution, they should move their budget toward the publishers, creatives, dayparts, audiences and geographies that are working to drive the most action to fully maximize spend.

Sophisticated CTV platforms treat each campaign like real-time A/B tests. For example, if a “millennial women” audience segment is outperforming “Gen Z women” or a 15-second creative is outperforming a 30-second creative, this data is used to inform media buying with a bidder that moves budget toward the highest performing campaign variables – in this case, “millennial women” with that 15-second creative.

While it may be relatively new to some marketers, multi-touch attribution must become a top priority in CTV advertising strategy. By leveraging multi-touch attribution coupled with granular incrementality analysis, advertisers can effectively determine what’s making a true impact – and take swift action to drive higher return on ad spend.

Follow Digital Remedy (@cpxi) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

AdExchanger Senior Editors Anthony Vargas and Alyssa Boyle.

POSSIBLE 2026: AdExchanger's Hot Takes

AdExchanger Senior Editors Alyssa Boyle and Anthony Vargas share their takeaways from three days chatting about agentic AI at POSSIBLE.

Reddit Reports A 75% Boost In Q1 Ad Revenue As It Reaches For 100 Million Daily US Users

Generative AI search has pushed traffic off a cliff across most of the internet, but not on social platforms. Reddit included.

POSSIBLE 2026: Can AI Help Agencies Finally Break Down Those Silos?

Domenic Venuto, indie agency Horizon Media’s chief product and data officer, sat down with AdExchanger during POSSIBLE at the Fontainebleau in Miami to unpack the role of AI in today’s media and advertising landscape.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Google Touts Its AI Ad Tech Adoption And New AI Max Features

Google announced new features and ad types for AI Max, its AI-based bidding product for search and shopping or sponsored product ads. The company also touted “hundreds of thousands” of advertisers using AI Max.

Hand pressing blue AI button on keyboard. Digital collage of artificial intelligence interface.

Meta’s Ad Machine Is Purring, So Why Did Its Stock Drop?

Meta’s Q1 call sounded like an AI and hardware pitch, but under the hood it was still about one thing: investing in AI to squeeze more money out of its ads business.

Alphabet Exceeds $100 Billion In Q1 And Its Profits Almost Doubled

Alphabet earned $109.9 billion in Q1 this year, up from $90.2 billion a year ago. And that’s not even the truly gobsmacking number.