Home Mobile In A Marketing Cloud Space Full Of Goliaths, Apsalar Wants To Be Its Mobile David

In A Marketing Cloud Space Full Of Goliaths, Apsalar Wants To Be Its Mobile David

SHARE:

davidgoliathWith mobile marketing automation sizzling and VC cash flowing, Apsalar is looking to capitalize.

On Wednesday, the mobile attribution platform added an audience distribution layer to its stack, effectively enabling its clients to combine the data with the doing.

“We’re finding that CMOs want to have everything in one place, not a bunch of point solutions,” said Apsalar CEO Michael Oiknine.

That’s the case at sports trading card company Topps. It already used Apsalar for its mobile attribution and now will also use the platform for segmentation, making audiences available for activation and for analytics.

“Most of the time, you’ve got an attribution partner on one side and then you’ve also got to put that data into an analytics platform,” said Deniz Gezgin, director of user acquisition and digital and mobile marketing at Topps. “We’re doing quite a bit of remarketing, and the cloud lets us analyze all of our activity and install data in one location. It’s also cost-effective to combine execution and data.”

The Apsalar cloud is comprised of four components: mobile attribution (the company’s historical bread and butter), analytics, audience segmentation and audience distribution.

But why does the world need another marketing cloud? The traditional cloud space is crowded by all the usual behemoth suspects – Oracle, Salesforce and Adobe – and several well-funded mobile-centric upstarts, including Appboy, Swrve, Kahuna and Leanplum.

For Gezgin, Apsalar’s DNA as an attribution platform is appealing because it minimizes the need for Topps to share with multiple partners its valuable first-party data, including post-install analytics and revenue data. Apsalar already houses all of that data by default.

“If we have a choice, we’d rather share as little data as possible,” Gezgin said. “Our external partners don’t need to have all of our data just because they’re the provider of a platform we use.”

Topps doesn’t work with any of the legacy clouds. Although the brand’s amassed a lot of data – Gezgin estimates that Topps has acquired around 6 million people in the US so far, which is somewhere between 60% to 70% of the total mobile trading card collector population – it’s not enough to justify the expense of working with Oracle, Salesforce or Adobe.

“Our data warehouse and our internal capabilities are not to a point where we can work with the really big partners yet,” Gezgin said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Oiknine is unabashed in his ambition to get snapped up by one of the bigger marketing clouds, which he predicts will start getting acquisitive in the mobile space within the next 18 to 24 months. It’s the classic narrative of fragmentation followed by consolidation.

“I would love one of them to acquire us,” he said. “Are you kidding me?”

Although the clouds have been acquisitive recently, they’re still lagging on the mobile front. The DMP Krux, acquired by Salesforce, is a good example.

“They have an SDK, but they’re primarily still a web platform at heart, and one day they will have to really do mobile,” Oiknine said. “And at that point, there will no longer be separate mobile marketing clouds.”

So far, 20 clients use Apsalar‘s cloud functionality; 60% are mobile-first companies and the remainder are more traditional brands.

There’s a healthy market for its cloud platform among brands with big mobile presences, Oiknine said.

“They find it very credible if you work with mobile pure-play companies and they will choose to work with you for that reason, because you have a mobile story to tell,” he said. “Quite frankly, that’s how you start to disrupt the Adobes of the world. You start slow, you work with big clients, you don’t charge as much and then they look over at you and say, ‘Who are these guys and why do customers work with them?’”

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.