Home Marketer's Note As Eyeballs Move To Mobile, Publishers And Marketers Still Struggle To Adapt

As Eyeballs Move To Mobile, Publishers And Marketers Still Struggle To Adapt

SHARE:

catherinemarketersnoteMarketer’s Note” is a regular column informing marketers about the rapidly evolving, digital marketing technology ecosystem.

This week it is written by Catherine Oddenino, Analyst, AdExchanger Research.

While working on publisher-focused research, there’s a common theme I hear from vendors and publishers alike: The transition to mobile is hurting their bottom lines.

Just as some publishers are finally becoming “experts” with their desktop digital ad sales, more than half of their traffic is coming from mobile devices, leaving their desktop sales in a state of decline. In most cases, just putting the same ad tags on a mobile version of the site creates a suboptimal user experience. Ads are not likely to perform as well and users may get annoyed and jump ship, leaving publishers with even less inventory to monetize.

On the marketer’s side, they feel challenged by mobile data. As I wrote in this Marketer’s Note from June, it can feel like we are drowning in data. To make matters worse, mobile data is not yet meeting marketers’ needs. One marketer I spoke to recently expressed frustration with how far behind mobile data was compared to desktop.

“Data is our biggest challenge,” the marketer said. “It’s different from desktop data, which makes it difficult for our analyst team. If it takes three months to compile, it’s not something that I can use to optimize a campaign.”

Publishers and marketers are still not on the same page, in terms of the value of mobile. We found a gap in how some publishers and marketers view the primary benefits of mobile in our December survey of mobile advertising professionals. While 46% of publisher respondents viewed “being the only advertiser on screen” as the primary benefit of mobile, only 20% of marketer respondents agreed.

Marketers and vendors I’ve spoken to for my current report see “being the only advertiser on screen” as a given and not necessarily a benefit because they are wary of mobile’s delicate balance of becoming too intrusive on the customer’s experience.

Graph-MN-090915

Marketers consistently complain that there are “no cookies” on mobile. Marketers and publishers need to untether themselves from the cookie. New formats require new measurement. Trying to force legacy metrics because you finally got everyone on your team to understand the first type of digital data isn’t going to drive your business goals.

Cross-device targeting needs to become part of your marketing plans. This will require marketers to learn how to use “deterministic” and “probabilistic” data and creates a slew of privacy questions. But executing cross-device campaigns with greater accuracy will help marketers enjoy higher returns on their media spend, which should be the ultimate goal, we concluded in our recent report.

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.