Home Digital TV and Video Yahoo Gets Video Distribution With Rayv; Is A Video Ad Platform Next?

Yahoo Gets Video Distribution With Rayv; Is A Video Ad Platform Next?

SHARE:

yahoo rayvYahoo finally has its video distribution platform.

Following flirtations with Hulu, Dailymotion and NDN, the company pulled the trigger Friday on Rayv, an Israeli company focused on high-quality video.

In a post on Yahoo-owned Tumblr, Yahoo’s VP of cloud platform and services, P.P.S. Narayan, described how the deal is meant to enhance Yahoo’s “underlying technology infrastructure” in video.

“Yahoo is focused on growing video users and monthly streams, and while we’re only getting started, we’re very focused on this in 2014,” Narayan wrote. Yahoo did not disclose financial terms.

Rayv’s website, now dominated by a message about the acquisition, describes Rayv’s “full end-to-end solution that enables improved high-quality streaming for our online and mobile video content partners.”


This acquisition is important for Yahoo because it doesn’t have the video inventory it needs to compete with power players like YouTube.

“YouTube gets billions of views every month and Yahoo does not have that same inventory available, so acquisition is the way to go,” Aravindh Vanchesan, director of the digital media practice at research firm Frost and Sullivan, told AdExchanger in April.

And video advertising is hotter than a New York City sidewalk in July. When Mondelēz International struck its deal with TubeMogul, the focus was on video. Likewise, both Twitter and Facebook made their video plays in late June and early July, respectively, when Twitter snapped up SnappyTV and Facebook acquired video ad platform LiveRail.

And of course, one must not forget AOL’s purchase of Adap.tv last August or Comcast going in with Freewheel in March.

Acquisitions around video ad platforms have come at a ferocious pace. Yahoo, of course, doesn’t have that yet. But with Rayv, it has something its needed for a long time: the means to distribute its own video assets. A video ad platform would seem to be Yahoo’s next logical step, especially when one looks at all of its competitors with both video distribution and ad-serving tools.

Must Read

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)