Home Digital TV and Video How Targeted (And Measurable) Is Over-The-Top TV?

How Targeted (And Measurable) Is Over-The-Top TV?

SHARE:

ctvDespite the perception that over-the-top TV (OTT) supports digital ad-buying tactics – like dynamic insertion and targeting at scale – buying connected TV is still a largely manual process.

“Everything we do right now is I/O-direct with publishers,” said Seth Walters, senior partner for interactive and connected TV (CTV) for WPP’s advanced TV agency, Modi Media.

Tal Chalozin, co-founder and CTO of the interactive TV ad server Innovid, also noted that almost everything bought on over-the-top devices today is done so directly or on an I/O basis.

Theoretically, programmatic buying could combine inventory and add scale – there’s just not a lot of premium, broadcast-caliber video inventory out there to pool.

“You do see [programmatic vendors] getting into OTT, but there’s still very little inventory out there,” Chalozin said. “Volumewise, guys like Hulu, Fox or ESPN are the big sellers of impressions.” (For the purposes of this article, CTV is assumed to be a subset of OTT.)

Advanced TV buyers like Modi are used to aggregating their direct buys to accumulate reach and manage frequency across multiple over-the-top publishers, but it takes a lot of sweat equity.

The kind of cross-platform targeting and measurement found in digital is often harder to put into practice in OTT.

Oleg Korenfeld, EVP of ad tech and platforms at Mediavest Spark, said publisher and platform idiosyncrasies are what complicate OTT targeting today for most buyers.

“You have devices like Roku, Amazon Fire TV and Xbox, and then publishers like Hulu, Crackle and NBC, each with different rules,” he said. “The methodology should be there to deliver better audience measurement and targeting across the board, but it’s up to individual publishers to help you understand reach across devices and it’s up to the buy side to push for it.” 

Once more automation comes to the buying process, and measurement advances, more dollars will eventually flow, industry insiders predict.

And more data is being activated in OTT campaigns. Many buyers rely on authenticated data from individual publishers to attribute their ad exposures.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But until industry standards cover both device- and publisher/app-level data, OTT measurement is basically “semi-touch” attribution,” Korenfeld said.

The issue is data inconsistency across devices and apps. A consumer might give Roku or Hulu their age and birthday – but individual apps, such as Vevo, for example, might not be privy to that information.

“This is why Facebook is making a bigger play in OTT,” said Innovid’s Chalozin. “They already started buying media from A&E and Tubi TV to add OTT to their audience network, which could bring more census-level data into OTT.”

Another challenge is not all platforms package audiences equally.

Roku offers advertisers pre-qualified audiences through a program called Roku Audience Access, which allows buyers to go beyond the basics of contextual targeting. But a device like Apple TV doesn’t enable the same kind of audience targeting.

“In the meantime, we need to take a different approach to targeting on those devices, which will come more from the publishers that represent their video inventory on Apple TV,” Walters said. (Or, from the likes of Facebook, which is starting to sell ads via its audience network through individual apps on Apple TV and Roku.)

Powering New Attribution Models

Beyond measuring initial media exposures, advanced TV buyers like Modi must do a lot of heavy lifting themselves to prove attribution out in CTV.

Modi works with device partners like Roku (or other streaming providers) to match users at the (anonymized) subscriber or device-registration level.

Modi can then layer in purchase or credit card data or match those users to IP addresses using cookies, to attribute CTV views to other conversion or performance-based metrics.

“We’re working with Experian to pixel our media and match it back to their DMP, which can be translated into a household or Experian ID at the individual level,” Walters said. “From there, we can look at the impact of our campaigns against any form of post-campaign metric, whether that’s sales or web traffic or visits to a brick-and-mortar location based on exposure to CTV.”

OTT suppliers like Hulu are fielding more requests from advertisers for advanced measurement models, which is why it is piloting deeper attribution to link Hulu ads to in-store foot traffic and purchasing, said Julie DeTraglia, head of ad sales research for Hulu.

“We have this benefit of census-level exposure data at the household level, which makes it easier to do, but the question of the year is, when will we have consistent, holistic, standardized measurement across every platform?” she said. “Nielsen delayed the initial public launch of their total audience project, namely because it’s really hard to do. This only happens if the industry collectively collaborates.”

Must Read

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.