Home Data-Driven Thinking Without Cookies, Ad Tech Will Have To Learn To Collaborate

Without Cookies, Ad Tech Will Have To Learn To Collaborate

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Bob Walczak, CEO of MadTech Advisors.

This past summer, there was plenty of conversation swirling about whether ad tech companies had a viable future as publicly traded entities. Equity researchers might feel the end is near, but that’s shortsighted and misguided. 

The advertising and ad technology industries undergo a major landscape shift every five years or so, and we’re in the middle of a seismic change with third-party signal loss. Yet, even with that massive adjustment, ad tech continues to overcome technical challenges. 

Every company spends money on marketing and advertising because advertising sells their products. These budgets are in the tens of billions of dollars in aggregate, translating to trillions of dollars in revenue. No company will accept signal loss as a reason to cut their advertising and the revenue it generates.

What we’re seeing isn’t the end of ad tech but a market shift to a new, viable, future-proof signal paradigm. Third-party cookie deprecation will force tech companies to develop stronger first-party data products built around users who have opted in. 

As with every exploration and monetization of a new frontier, the next era of digital advertising requires a recommitment to shoulder-to-shoulder collaboration.

Technology’s limitations

Ad tech’s present is built on unconsented data collection and behavioral tracking. Even writing that sounds a little dirty. Clean rooms have emerged as a method for companies with consented data to collaborate in a safe environment that maintains consumer privacy. But anyone looking at clean rooms as the savior of ad tech needs to look harder. 

Clean rooms are enabling conversations, but it’s direct relationships that have the best chance at solving digital media’s problems.

Outsiders think the loss of the cookie as a common connector will kill the industry. What they fail to see is that this loss will force brands, publishers and platforms to interact directly. A somewhat standoffish industry is finally being called to collaborate on a level that cookies allowed us to previously avoid. 

Intimacy necessitates infrastructure

The intimate nature of first-party data requires technical solutions that safeguard customer data privacy and compliance. But cold technology can’t reach the necessary level of intimacy. This requires a face-to-face, look-in-your-counterpart’s-eyes level of communication and trust.

There’s no more hiding behind an anonymized cookie. Companies have to collaborate or die, which means the relationships between brands, agencies, publishers and platforms have to be deeper and more transparent than we’ve ever seen.

Trust is now a necessary layer of industry infrastructure. Building enough scale and reach in an audience segment will take multiple groups coming together to deliver the solution. Buyers need insight into origin, accuracy and consent. Then they need to measure performance. No single organization is equipped to accomplish this alone.

What’s stopping us?

While change is afoot, roadblocks remain. Clean rooms have an interoperability issue and have yet to agree upon a clear industry standard. Clean room providers have historically given each other the cold shoulder, but there are signs the ice is melting. 

Then there are alternative IDs. By mixing in unconsented IDs, there is potential danger in a privacy-sensitive climate.

Finally, there are publisher-specific challenges. The use of first-party data requires second-party networks, but US publishers have long resisted forming consortiums. While we have small networks of publishers, we need true collaboration across hundreds to scale the consented, data-enriched audience segments that brands want.

Laws and regulations are forthcoming. The future of data-driven marketing is at stake. Equity researchers analyzing ad tech will take the easy short view and trade away, which is fine. The smart money is to bet long on ad tech as it builds the relational infrastructure needed for this new frontier. The fundamentals are already in place.The end of days for this industry is nowhere in sight.

Follow MadTech Advisors on LinkedIn and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

For more articles featuring Bob Walczak, click here.

Must Read

PubMatic’s Agentic AI Is Going Beyond Direct Deals

PubMatic has run more than 30 fully autonomous, end-to-end agentic campaigns through the SSP’s AgenticOS platform, in addition to more than 1,000 direct publisher deals.

The Trade Desk Has A Grand Vision, But Needs A New Breed Of CMO To Make It A Reality

TTD CEO Jeff Green laid out the DSP’s plan for winning in a new world of advertising that – AI aside – necessitates major changes in how marketers behave.

A Publisher Didn’t Get Its UID2 Setup Right. The Trade Desk Didn’t Notice. What Went Wrong?

TTD confirmed that this CTV publisher’s errors would have made its UID2s useless for ad targeting. But TTD also said it wouldn’t have had enough information to flag the issue.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Criteo Faces Tough Headwinds Until Agentic AI Ad Revenue Materializes

Criteo shares dropped by 20% Wednesday morning after the company reported shaky Q1 earnings and revised its guidance downward for the rest of the year.

Disney’s New CEO Is Focused On Two E’s: Engagement And ESPN

On Wednesday, Josh D’Amaro led his first earnings call as the new CEO of Disney. The company closed last quarter with $25.2 billion in revenue, a 7% year-over-year increase. Disney Entertainment advertising revenue rose 5% YOY, but ESPN ad revenue was down 2% YOY, although subscription and affiliate revenue was up 6%.

People Inc. Looks Inward For Growth As Its Search Traffic Downsizes

People Inc. previewed plans to downsize by focusing mainly on its key properties. The strategy makes sense considering its publishing portfolio has lost about two-thirds of its Google traffic.