Home Data-Driven Thinking Why Email Will – And Won’t – Be The Online Ad Industry’s Next Main Identifier

Why Email Will – And Won’t – Be The Online Ad Industry’s Next Main Identifier

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Ron Jacobson, CEO and co-founder at Rockerbox.

Every couple of years, the foundations of online advertising are completely ripped apart. This time, it’s the impending death of third-party cookies and the de facto deprecation of Apple’s IDFA.

Digital advertisers are scrambling for a new identifier. But maybe it doesn’t need to be invented.

The ad industry is already eyeing email as a potential marketing currency with more durability than the third-party cookie.

Scale is an issue, of course, but putting that aside, the benefits of email are clear. For years already, email has enabled advertisers to market directly to customers and to create Custom Audience on Facebook and Instagram. Publishers big and small, from The New York Times to local newspapers, can reengage site visitors and woo them into subscriptions.

But there’s a big question here: How can email be applied to paid media?

Practical applications

To start, every advertising channel that was previously reliant on IDFA or cookies for attribution would need a way for advertiser and publishers to compare the email addresses of converters with those who were exposed to ads.

For the large social platforms (i.e. Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat) this isn’t a big shift at all. For one, users are logged in so the platform knows the email of everyone who’s been served an ad.

Advertisers are already sending email addresses associated with every converter to these platforms. All the data is there for the social platforms to know if the converter was exposed to an ad or not. The main difference here is that advertisers are using a conversion event, such as email capture, sign-up or purchase, which is further down the funnel, rather than the IDFA associated with an install.

For programmatic buys, advertisers could upload their email lists to DSPs.

These emails could be matched against an email parameter that would be added to future versions of OpenRTB. This is already happening now to an extent, with advertisers uploading customer lists to companies such as LiveRamp in order to create targetable segments.

And for direct site buys, it’s even simpler. Publishers that only allow logged-in visitors know the emails of everyone who is served an ad.

For both of these scenarios there are fair questions that crop up, including a big one about where the match actually happens, be that with the publisher, advertiser or a third-party vendor. My gut says that it will happen both on the publisher side and through third-party vendors.

But regardless of how this shakes out, there’s an elephant in the room: Regulation.

Regulatory roadblocks

Although email should technically win the currency race because it’s a more accurate way to transact, privacy regulations will probably stop that from happening.

And beyond government regulation, such as GDPR in the EU and the CCPA in California, the platforms are making their own moves.

As Apple has shown both through IDFA changes and its App Store policies, platforms have the ability to dictate the rules that everyone else has to play by.

Speaking of Apple, though, if it had its way, there’s no doubt it would prefer that all apps exclusively leverage its privacy-first “Sign In With Apple” offering. Email for the win, right?

Perhaps. But the biggest challenge of all comes from a corner of the world that the ad industry often forgets to consider: The consumer.

Will consumers be comfortable sharing their email address with apps, publishers and ecommerce companies at the scale necessary for email to become a viable online identifier? I think so as it’s already practically happening. The larger question is whether consumers will be comfortable with their emails being shared across providers. Or will consumer apathy to privacy lead to an outcome where regulators have to decide?

Only time, consumer preference and regulators will tell.

Follow Ron Jacobson (@rjjacobson) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Let’s Be Upfront About Performance

During upfronts, publishers flexed their ad performance muscles at media buyers all week long in an effort to appeal to the biggest demands media buyers have during their upfront negotiations: flexibility and results.

Upfronts Day Two: Dancing And Data

TelevisaUnivision and Disney took over Day Two of upfronts week in New York City on Tuesday, and the throughline was data quality.

Warner Bros. Discovery’s Upfront Was All About Performance

Warner Bros. Discovery used its upfront stage to announce two new ad measurement efforts, including that it’s joining a CAPI-focused initiative led by OpenAP.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Upfronts Day One: Publishers Jostle For Position As Performance Drivers

AdExchanger Senior Editor Alyssa Boyle and Associate Editor Victoria McNally traversed the island of Manhattan on Monday to scope out upfront presentations by NBCUniversal, Fox and Amazon.

Viant Sees A Growth Wave Coming, But First Marketers Must Really Ditch Walled Garden Ad Tech

Viant’s modest growth story took a backseat to a far louder claim: that fed-up advertisers are finally ready to ditch the rigged economics of Big Tech’s walled gardens.

Amazon’s Interactive CTV Ad Suite Now Includes Creative Optimization

Amazon Ads expects this year’s television upfronts to be an outcomes-focused affair. That may explain why the company preempted its Monday evening presentation by announcing the launch of a new ad product called Dynamic TV Creative.