Home Data-Driven Thinking The Fallacy of Calling Atlas People-Based ‘Marketing’

The Fallacy of Calling Atlas People-Based ‘Marketing’

SHARE:

mattkeiserddtData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Matt Keiser, founder and CEO at LiveIntent.

If I’ve learned one thing from my 20 years in marketing, it’s this: When brands market to people, they expect to be able to close the loop with measurement and attribution.

Only in the world of advertising would anonymous results be acceptable. And let there be no doubt: Advertising’s essential role is prospecting to the unknown. Meanwhile, the role of the marketer is changing. In today’s environment, the marketer needs to push known data into systems purposely designed to keep them from closing the loop, such as Facebook, Twitter or Yahoo.

It’s a frustrating battle that I predict will soon be resolved as a result of competition between the tech titans.

I believe that while Atlas is impressive and groundbreaking, it is a two-legged stool.

Atlas taps into Facebook’s network of logged-in users and lets marketers target users across channels and devices wherever Atlas is being used. However, it is my understanding that once Facebook gets the brands’ first-party (CRM) data, it isn’t passed back to marketers. This means that marketers can’t realize their true goal: closing the loop on attribution, understanding customer lifetime value, engagement, net promoter score and ROI at the user level. Knowing in aggregate just isn’t good enough. Marketing technology supports long-term outcomes, which puts closed-loop measurement and attribution at the center.

Hence, Facebook isn’t offering people-based marketing, it’s offering people-based advertising. That’s a significant distinction.

Who Has It Backward Now? 

Call me dyslexic if you must (I am openly dyslexic) but in this case, I think it’s the rest of the industry that has it backward. Marketers, not advertisers, should run people-based advertising technology. Advertisers’ goals, such as impressions, click-throughs and frequency, are more transactional, as opposed to focusing on customer lifetime value and success.

That doesn’t mean that the metrics prized by advertisers aren’t important to marketers. But they need to be connected back to what matters: building a relationship with the customer that leads to long-term success. Marketers need to use technology that empowers them to communicate with known customers wherever they are spending time, whether it’s email, web, mobile web, in-app, search, social or video. Marketers of the future will need to go beyond email only and take back the relationship with the known customer.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Hence, marketers should be in control of the CRM data that fuels Facebook Atlas and people-based products. Notice I did not say “people-based marketing products.”

Comprehensive People-Based Marketing Does Not Exist Yet

Facebook is trying to pass off its ability to offer more targeted advertising and call it marketing.

This trend is endemic. Two weeks ago, Marketo announced the launch of its Ad Bridge product. Marketo CEO Phil Fernandez said the ability to tie digital ads to lead nurturing is unique to Marketo.

Marketo is the first marketing cloud that is bold enough to incorporate advertising technology, and it should get a lot of credit. It overcame ad tech-itis and integrated. It’s obvious there’s a convergence of ad tech and mar tech, and Marketo showed decisiveness.

However, to say Ad Bridge is unique is to misspeak. LiveRamp and the Oracle ID Graph make it possible to onboard CRM data for lead nurturing into almost any advertising technology. Salesforce Active Audience lets you onboard data into social (however, I predict that was an initial foray and its reputation suggests it’ll extend that capability soon). Lead Accelerator, formerly Bizo, allows for targeting anonymous prospects but LinkedIn’s login data could easily be used, if it is not already, to develop people-based targeting.

Criteo and AOL are investing heavily in acquiring the data needed to reach people across their platforms. And Google is rumored to be moving forward with search targeting using the email address. It’s worth speculating that DoubleClick Audience Center could enable first-party data to be used for people-based marketing within DoubleClick for the first time.

So, what Marketo is doing is exciting, but it’s really not unique. It’s also not what the promise of the future of the marketing cloud looks like fulfilled.

In an already complex ecosystem, combining marketing technology with advertising technology was a good first step. But we need this functionality built into a unified platform purposefully designed for marketers to market to known customers across email, web, mobile, apps, search and social. Prioritizing channels that allow the marketer to close the data loop across real-time email, video, display, mobile and in-app, so that marketers can manage the relationship wherever the customer is paying attention, is the dream. As of yet, no one has gone whole-hog and built a technology for marketers that includes the advertising technology necessary to complete this.

The function of marketing works best when it’s tasked with developing relationships with customers. While this involves overseeing advertising campaigns on a macro level, marketing should not be involved in the nitty-gritty. The next evolution is a purpose-built solution that combines ad tech with known customer data designed for marketers that’s operated by marketers. This open platform would also work with any point solution that functions as an open platform that provides anonymized exposure data on known users to close the loop for measurement and attribution purposes.

What’s The Hold Up?

There’s a reticence by marketing cloud vendors to embrace ad tech. Marketing cloud vendors want their technology to reach the same audience that was developed by ad tech vendors, while maintaining focus on their mission. This means delegating advertising and prospecting, as opposed to owning it.

That’s the plan for marketers but it can’t easily be done because no one has built or strategically acquired the right pieces to implement it. Today, a marketer needs to push known data into systems purposely designed to keep them from closing the loop. But I predict we’ll soon see clouds integrate with platforms that will round-trip the data, or see clouds integrate with third parties that make it possible.

I believe a solution is coming that will give the power back to marketers. The first step was to touch ad tech. The next is to let marketing automation software go beyond rules and workflow to get drunk on the tech.

I am confident the buzz will allow marketers to forget about ad tech-itis and the walled garden, people-based advertising that Facebook tried to pawn off as marketing.

Follow Matt Keiser (@mrkeiser), LiveIntent (@LiveIntent) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.