Home Data-Driven Thinking Optimization: A Journey, With No Silver Bullet

Optimization: A Journey, With No Silver Bullet

SHARE:

erikweissData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Erik Weiss, chief revenue officer at Datacratic.

One of the biggest benefits of digital advertising is the ability to use performance metrics. Attribution may be disputable but some campaign conversion types are not, which has led to a boon in performance-based businesses.

Traditional brand advertisers have also entered the fray, requiring measurable digital objectives. Consequently, competition to demonstrate lift is intense. It’s not uncommon for advertisers to put multiple networks, publishers and demand-side platforms on a campaign to see which will best perform and receive the lion’s share of the budget.

But past returns do not guarantee future performance. The winners need to repeatedly prove themselves for future dollars. To stay competitive, media buyers deploy a myriad of optimization techniques, but I believe there is no one size that fits all. Each step requires its own unique blend of tools and know-how, a careful balance that is a combination of art and science.

Varying Techniques

Companies may manually divide campaign line items into hundreds of sublines to target each possible tactic for lift, and then rearrange spending accordingly. Others hire teams of data scientists to apply the latest machine learning capabilities. Still others seek out and apply unique data sources to their campaigns. Survival requires doing whatever necessary to eke out an advantage.

Vendors may offer full platforms and services where optimization is either managed or built in. Some are known for proprietary approaches and technology that seem to perform competitively. Yet performance can be fickle. Optimization models, inventory, time of day, geo, behavior, first-party data, third-party data and other targeted attributes may show positive gains and then suddenly cease to maintain their position. The best data scientists may struggle with mediocre data and limited inventory. And then the data and inventory that works the best can change quickly.

Constant Investment

To perform competitively, marketers need to make continuous investments in inventory sources, data, campaign probing, technology and a well-trained campaign team. Even with these approaches, finding the right trade-off between learning and performance is difficult to automate and there are various components to test and optimize. For example, targeting the right audience through advanced modelling requires integration with a data-management platform or internal data store.

When managing one’s own technology stack, the costs of the infrastructure need to be efficient enough to justify the investment. Server costs, for instance, cannot take up a meaningful percentage of the media budget.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Even with the most advanced technology that can remove many manual tasks associated with optimization, care from an experienced campaign manager, trained in data science-based methods, is needed. Conversions used to build models must be far-reaching and current to find the users and impressions with the highest probability of conversion. Marketers need robust data to properly predict the likely economic value of an impression. Continuous probing for new types of converters across inventory types and behavioral signals keep the optimization fresh.

The Journey

There is no silver bullet, be it format, data, inventory source, algorithm or manual approach, to achieve sustainable superior results. There is a blend of science and know-how, reach, setup, maintenance, testing, tools, analysis and re-examination.

There are various models and methods for each step of the way to optimize across audiences, creative types and formats, second-price auctions, guaranteed inventory and closed marketplaces. There needs to be an organizational commitment across business and technical departments.

Optimization is a journey, and each step requires creativity, discipline and leadership to be successful.

Follow Datacratic (@datacratic) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”