Home Data-Driven Thinking On TikTok, There’s A Fine Line Between Timely Trend And Fleeting Fad

On TikTok, There’s A Fine Line Between Timely Trend And Fleeting Fad

SHARE:
Paige Leidig, CMO, NetBase Quid.

“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Paige Leidig, CMO, NetBase Quid.

Any business that advertises online is aware of emerging trends – or, at the very least, it should be. Many businesses seek to use trends as springboards to meaningful connections with consumers. This sounds logical in our trend-driven world, but the danger of chasing a fad by mistake looms large. And it threatens to reduce a brand’s hard work to rubble. It’s like parents trying too hard with their teen’s friends. The response is equally jarring.

What’s the difference between the two? A trend is “a general development or change in a situation or in the way that people are behaving.” On the other hand, a fad is “a style, activity, or interest that is very popular for a short period of time.”

When a brand participates in a trend that resonates with its followers, it’s evolving along with changing times. For example, sustainability-based marketing started as a trendy way to relate to a small but vocal consumer base. But this movement has won global adoption, and businesses everywhere are becoming carbon neutral or even carbon negative.

A fad, on the other hand, has much less staying power. Consider the #NoMakeup fad. In a world that’s filter-obsessed, with makeup influencers growing in popularity, a cosmetics brand betting on ‘creamy naturals’ would be left behind in a world of bold looks from big names (think Kardashians).

So, how can businesses distinguish between the two for effective advertising, especially when it comes to advertising on TikTok, the king of trend-based content? 

Flash in the pan versus slow boil

Trends take time. They’re the slow boil that builds momentum in spurts. Often, they’re part of the cultural zeitgeist. Although they may be novel, they make sense.

Speaking to the former, with so many people now working from home for so long, the concept of casual Fridays has morphed into a focus on “business comfort” – one that organizations now realize can have a positive impact on productivity. It’s a shift born of necessity, but it also aligns with prevailing work culture. And, after all, we know that happy employees are more productive employees.

Consider another trend that feels novel but also makes sense: wearable technology. When Google Glass was first made publicly available in 2014, the world was not ready. But just two short years later, wearable tech had cleared the early adopter hurdle and became ubiquitous. When the time was right, it clicked. Trends typically do.

Consumers talk about trends using descriptions like “something we’ve all been waiting for.” Those that follow are “early adopters” or “niche aficionados.” And there’s a community that develops around them. Although the demographics and psychographics may shift, the strength of the community’s emotional investment in the trend determines its longevity. There’s passion there.

Fads hit differently. When a fad is born, it may start off slowly, disguised as a trend. But interest spikes in a way that leaves onlookers baffled. There’s a sense of urgency around it, as consumers spend inordinate amounts of time talking about it, with a corresponding rush to join in. And there’s a rush for brands to jump in as well, as they know it may pass before they get to participate.

Take “man buns,” for instance. At a certain point in time, they were the hip hairstyle for rebellious males – and all at once they were everywhere. Celebrities couldn’t get enough of them. But they were also associated with a sense of potential immaturity and unprofessionalism, and most people (aka not celebrities) who tried sporting the bun eventually gave it up.

But probably the wildest and most well-known fad demonstrating how powerful that FOMO feeling can be is found in the Pet Rock craze that hit consumers in 1975. People paid for rocks that came with a care and training manual. The whole thing was entirely nonsensical. Yet it lasted for six months, making its creator millions. But had others tried to latch onto this fad and developed a pet stick or some other oddity, the appetite for it would likely have been nonexistent. 

Today, as brands navigate trends and fads and make tough decisions about where to direct their dollars, there’s one platform where the line between the two is particularly blurry: TikTok. 

Distinguishing between TikTok trends and fads

TikTok capitalized on a few prevailing trends as it rose to social media dominance. Video and short attention spans combined with an unmet need for digital distraction resulted in the 2020 TikTok explosion. It has become a hub – and home – for digital life across nearly every demographic.

However, the “trends” we see on TikTok are really just fads.

While wildly popular for a solid moment in time, most new dances, image effects and challenges fade away, only to be replaced by new ones. The typical life cycle of a TikTok fad is approximately 3-4 days.

But does this mean your brand shouldn’t hop on that next trend train as it zooms by – and potentially miss a big promotional opportunity? Certainly not. If the fad aligns with your company’s voice, try it out. But wait half a beat to examine the passion powering it and conversation surrounding it. It will help direct your efforts to something worthwhile that forms a true consumer connection.

Ultimately, your brand will want to participate in a strategic way that aligns with your mission. Don’t just wait to go viral with a random audience who will never convert. Be focused, not fad-driven.

Follow NetBase Quid (@NetBaseQuid) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter. 

Tagged in:

Must Read

Single continuous line drawing robot riding pencil rocket flying in the sky. Tech education and creativity. Future technology development. Artificial intelligence. One line design vector illustration

Q3: Omnicom’s Media Business Is Growing, But Is It Agent-Proof?

If AI agents can plan and buy media, who needs a holding company? Good question. It came up during Omnicom’s Q3 earnings on Thursday.

Netflix Touts New Measurement Capabilities As It Struggles With “Modest” Engagement Growth

Netflix’s revenue grew 12% YOY to $12.9 billion in Q3, which it maintains is in line with its forecast. Its ads business, however, is lagging slightly compared with expectations, causing Netflix to tweak its forecast for the rest of the year.

Apple Publishes Its Plan To Wipe Out Web Tracking

Apple is coming for identity resolution. WebKit’s latest tracking crackdown targets the infrastructure behind post-cookie IDs – and switching to a first-party setup won’t necessarily spare vendors.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Slop Sites Are On The Rise. Is Ad Tech Ready For Its New MFA Challenge?

Advertising supply chain intelligence company DecryptAds uncovered more than 2,100 AI-generated recipe sites that are monetized with programmatic ads and feature fabricated author profiles.

How Australian Home Lender Lendi Measures The Invisible Work Of AI

Most brands and businesses are trying to figure out how to improve their metrics when it comes to AI – and also what those metrics even are.

AI Startup Minerva Built An Agentic CDP, But Don’t Call It That

Minerva wants to turn fragmented customer data into something marketers can use, with AI agents doing the work behind the scenes.