Home Data-Driven Thinking In A Market With No Ratings Standards, How Can the Best Data Win?

In A Market With No Ratings Standards, How Can the Best Data Win?

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Greg Herbst, vice president of programmatic data solutions at Bombora.

Oil, steel, movies, games, credit, alcohol, stocks and bonds: They are all bought and sold, and each is rated by independent agencies using standardized grades so that the buyer – be it a consumer or a business – knows what they are getting.

But audience data, the foundation of the global online ad industry and central to the growth of programmatic advertising, has no system of impartial quality determination.

Data within digital advertising is scrutinized, yes, but mostly with outdated metrics like click-through rate. As the industry buzzes about cross-device capabilities, omnichannel campaigns, location-based targeting, offline-to-online data and predictive marketing plans, there needs to be a major improvement in rating the efficacy of data for ad campaigns.

If you work in digital advertising, you need performance reporting, regardless of whether you are on the marketer or publisher side. Wouldn’t it be great if a neutral party tested the audience data partners and reported the results? Sure, this happens when individual brands run their own bake-offs, but we need an entity that tests providers that offer similar data sets and announces the performance or results.

Regular ratings on dimensions such as quality, recency, depth, detail, origin, commercial rights, utility and privacy would make evaluation easier for buyers. From there, vertical-specific studies and overall rankings would be helpful to all who play in the industry, across both the buy and sell sides.

In this kind of system, confident and strong data providers would race to compete head-to-head on performance, while others would avoid such ratings. There is no shortage of players who have taken shortcuts to enter the market and then provide lower pricing to get rich quick on a transaction. Meanwhile, new data providers increasingly enter this space, opaquely repackaging the same data sources and causing conflict and confusion in the market.

Independent ratings would also put an end to the data sales pitches that have come to feel repetitive. Let’s face it: The players on the data provider side can frequently sound the same, and many offer very similar data sets. Marketers need data, but they don’t have time to dive into the nuances that differentiate the many companies competing for their budget, nor can they test each and every one.

There are plenty of organizations that could own these ratings, but there is no obvious choice. Traditional analyst and market research firms, such as Gartner, Forrester and SiriusDecisions, already occupy positions of authority, but do they have capacity to become ratings agencies?

Is it a chance for their upstart challengers, including G2 Crowd and TrustRadius, to displace them? Data marketplaces like Oracle, LiveRamp or AppNexus have a wide view of what data is available and how it’s used, but they also face conflicts because they sell their own data.

Industry advocacy groups such as the IAB, Digital Advertising Alliance, BPA and others would seem like a natural fit, but it raises questions about whether they can reach a consensus among their constituencies before rolling out universal ratings. In all likelihood, a separate, independent body would split off from any one of these groups or companies to lead this charge.

The time has come for these kinds of ratings. The digital ad industry can continue to scream about the problem of too much data and feel anger that it is unjustly scrutinized, or it can become a problem solver and adopt measurement means to identify the quality data providers and share the results.

The more analytics a brand has access to, the more easily they can monitor their data sources and determine which resources are “good” data and which will not be as helpful in reaching campaign goals. There are many ways to measure performance with the ever-improving technology, but how about an old-school Roman gladiator challenge, in the form of a bake-off, to add to the mix?

Follow Bombora (@bomboradata) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Upfronts Day One: Publishers Jostle For Position As Performance Drivers

And that’s a wrap on Day One of upfronts 2026! AdExchanger Senior Editors Alyssa Boyle and Victoria McNally traversed the island of Manhattan on Monday to scope out upfront presentations by NBCUniversal, Fox and Amazon.

Viant Sees A Growth Wave Coming, But First Marketers Must Really Ditch Walled Garden Ad Tech

Viant’s modest growth story took a backseat to a far louder claim: that fed-up advertisers are finally ready to ditch the rigged economics of Big Tech’s walled gardens.

Amazon’s Interactive CTV Ad Suite Now Includes Creative Optimization

Amazon Ads expects this year’s television upfronts to be an outcomes-focused affair. That may explain why the company preempted its Monday evening presentation by announcing the launch of a new ad product called Dynamic TV Creative.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Is Agentic Commerce An Oasis Or Mirage?

For companies like Shopify, Criteo and Instacart – and even for giants like Amazon and Walmart – figuring out if the agentic oasis is real or a mirage is their priority No. 1.

PubMatic’s Agentic AI Is Going Beyond Direct Deals

PubMatic has run more than 30 fully autonomous, end-to-end agentic campaigns through the SSP’s AgenticOS platform, in addition to more than 1,000 direct publisher deals.

The Trade Desk Has A Grand Vision, But Needs A New Breed Of CMO To Make It A Reality

TTD CEO Jeff Green laid out the DSP’s plan for winning in a new world of advertising that – AI aside – necessitates major changes in how marketers behave.