Home Data-Driven Thinking Is Your Data Usable?

Is Your Data Usable?

SHARE:
Jeff White, CEO, Gravy Analytics

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Marketers today have many data sources available to them, giving them the option to tailor data sets based on their specific needs. Whether it’s for audience segmentation or business operations, it can be tempting to buy the biggest data set available. However, it’s important that marketers think twice before diving in, especially when it comes to location data. 

Large location data sets often include raw data that has not been normalized or verified, leading to potential integrity issues.

As such, it’s essential that marketers look for two key components before selecting a data set: data normalization and quality assurance.

Improving accuracy and ensuring usability

Data regularly fluctuates due to a variety of factors, such as new suppliers or compliance regulations. Plus, on its own, it can be redundant or erroneous.

For example, while one location may have 95% accuracy, another location may have less than 5% accuracy. Similarly, the types of signals emitted by devices can vary in number and quality, further skewing the accuracy of the data. 

In fact, up to 45% of raw data can be unusable. But companies still need a place to store it, which typically requires purchasing costly data storage. 

And beyond the sheer size of raw location data sets, raw location data needs processing to determine what’s usable. This too can be costly, not to mention time-consuming. In short, raw location data that hasn’t been analyzed through a quality assurance lens is unpredictable.

So what can marketers do? First, data normalization can ensure data sets are consistent and prevent results from being skewed. It provides a level of stability to a data set, allowing marketers to develop more accurate analyses and create a clearer picture of changing trends over an extended period. From there, a quality assurance process can weed out any data that’s not viable, leaving marketers with more meaningful, actionable data.

Prerequisites to data success

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Data normalization and quality assurance are key to ensuring that a data set can be trusted. Without that level of confidence in the data, marketers cannot be sure that the data they’ve received is accurate, potentially invalidating any analysis they develop. 

Data has the power to unlock so many unique insights and trends, but if it hasn’t undergone the necessary procedures, that potential has been wasted.

Follow Gravy Analytics (@GravyAnalytics) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter. 

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.