Home Data-Driven Thinking Is It Time To Sunset The CPM?

Is It Time To Sunset The CPM?

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Tom Pallack, CEO at SITO Mobile.

It’s no secret that legacy media models are under siege. Perhaps nowhere is that more obvious than in the world of media buying and planning – and the impression CPM.

Given that marketers have more data, screens and channels at their disposal than ever, plus sophisticated attribution and media-mix systems that track specific channels to determine campaign ROI, media practitioners’ continued reliance on the CPM seems particularly outdated to me.

In a data-first world, the traditional CPM is no longer relevant and may even be an obstacle to achieving marketing effectiveness. I predict that savvy marketers across sectors, including filmed entertainment, casual dining and retail, will jettison the CPM and embrace a performance-based strategy that takes into account data from myriad sources – offline, online, location-based, etc. – and uses rigorous analytics that help them better understand their marketing ROI.

Take the movie business, for example. Major studios evaluate performance based on box office sales and in-theater attendance. Studios have only one shot at opening day and tend to spend a lot on marketing in the very short amount of time leading up to a new release. On opening day, studios can learn whether people who were exposed to promotion for the film actually wound up in the theater. Connected to online and offline media exposure, this real-world behavioral measure is powerful and speaks not only to the advantage of paying for performance, but media-mix attribution and omnichannel marketing.

Similarly, a national restaurant chain often pays for media based on the cost to acquire new customers. Viewed through a performance lens, the chain might see a spike in verified, walk-in traffic that attracts both new customers and reduces acquisition costs. In this case, “verified” means those who were exposed to advertising and were validated as entering a store location vs. those who weren’t exposed to advertising. A performance model would use data to inform the marketer which messages helped drive consumers to dine.

Using performance metrics to capture full-funnel ROI will lower acquisition costs and grow sales. Sectors that have shifted to performance enjoy increased advertising and marketing effectiveness. The CPM is the lowest common denominator for marketing impact and perpetuates much of the unintentional fuzziness around marketing. And it may, to some degree, perpetuate intentional aspects of digital media that are fraught with fraud or the use of proxies for viewability.

It may take some time for marketers long accustomed to the CPM to start paying on performance. However, an increasing awareness of impression fraud and media environment quality issues driven by the race to ever-lower CPMs will hasten the process. Other measures, such as cost per acquisition, are already starting to dislodge the CPM.

I define performance metrics as any standard of measure that aligns with business goals, such as increased store foot traffic, sales or even increased brand metrics like brand awareness. The challenge is connecting the data dots between business results and the advertising and media. While it’s a long and continuous journey for most marketers to get to this point, it’s achievable.

Marketers have little to lose by adopting a performance marketing strategy for the simple reason that the impression CPM doesn’t serve the marketer very well. The massive scaling of digital impression CPMs has created the unintended consequences of ad fraud at worst, and ineffective marketing at best. Applying TV media reach and frequency metrics to digital media is bad idea.

Brands that rely on immediate consumer impact and fulfilling needs on demand will continue to be in the vanguard of performance marketing. But nearly every category of business has an on-demand aspect today, and the performance lens can go wide and specific, unlike the CPM, which offers a messy and incomplete picture. The CPM serves no category well.

Follow SITO Mobile (@SITO_Mobile) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Why Wall Street Turned Against The Trade Desk

The Trade Desk is less than a third as valuable as it was a year ago. It retains about one-tenth of its high-water market cap from December 2024, when the company was worth almost $70 billion. Why did investors lose the faith?

Garrett McGrath, President, Prebid.org

Prebid’s New President Is Its Former Chairman, Garrett McGrath

McGrath left Prebid in June following five years as board chairman after stepping down as SVP of product management at Magnite. But now, overseeing Prebid will be his full-time job.

TV Manufacturer Telly Touts Programmatic Home Screen Ads

Telly, the startup that gives away free smart TVs in exchange for data and ad exposure, is making its home screen ads available for brands to buy programmatically – and pushing for industry standards to help attract more spend. 

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Is Helping L’Oréal Brainstorm Unique Ways To Reach Male Audiences

L’Oréal adopted creative AI platform Springboards to generate creative ideas that led to a collaborative, ongoing ideation process.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

Google won’t have to break up its ads business after being declared an online monopolist. Meanwhile, Amazon faces a lawsuit from the FTC alleging that it charged advertisers more than necessary for ecommerce ads.

The FTC’s Amazon Lawsuit Is Ad Tech’s History Of Opacity Repeating Itself

Buy-side experts said it’s another example of a Big Tech platform taking advantage of the lack of transparency built into programmatic ad auctions. And they’re not optimistic change is coming.