Home Data-Driven Thinking Gaming The Attribution System

Gaming The Attribution System

SHARE:

sephzdarko“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Seph Zdarko, head of attribution initiatives and partner strategy at Quantcast.

Attribution models were designed with the best of intentions: to help advertisers understand which ads lead their users to convert and to inform which tactics effectively grow their business. While advertisers work hard to use attribution properly, they often unknowingly incentivize the wrong behavior from vendors, leading to ineffective spending of their budgets.

It’s a dirty secret of today’s digital ecosystem. I call it “attribution gaming.”

The main reason gaming is so prevalent in display advertising today is the widespread use of last-touch attribution, a model in which 100% of the conversion credit goes to the last ad served before a conversion. With today’s cluttered ad ecosystem, the problem with the simplistic last-touch model is that it is easily gamed and lends itself to manipulation.

One of the most common ways to game last-touch attribution is to allocate the majority of an advertiser’s budget to retargeting consumers who are already close to a conversion. Computer algorithms use predictive modeling on nuanced signals to know when someone is close to converting. These signals include visiting an advertiser’s site multiple times or placing items in a checkout cart. Here, attribution gaming isn’t about influencing a consumer further down the marketing funnel. It’s about capturing the last-touch credit for a conversion that is likely going to happen anyway.

Other dirty secrets about gaming: The ad on the bottom of a page, which is typically the cheapest, has the highest value from an attributional perspective. That’s because the last ad on the page is the last to load and will get the last view credit.

An ad also doesn’t have to be seen to count. An ad can be served in a hidden iframe, in an interstitial or hidden below the fold, 15 ads deep. Quality isn’t nearly as important as quantity when it comes to attribution gaming.

Finally, when a consumer is in the checkout process and searches for a promotional offer or coupon, or checks social media before clicking “purchase,” the ad served at that moment gets all the credit for the conversion.

Persistent Tactics

Even with the addition of more sophisticated multitouch attribution models, many of the same gaming tactics still work. Since most solutions today still do not distinguish between a retargeted impression and a prospected impression, it continues to be all about serving more retargeting ads than the competition. In this way, multitouch attribution models heavily incentivize retargeting, since those impressions continue to make up the majority of ads served.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

You might think that a first touch is an upper-funnel prospected ad, but what if the first touch is after a consumer has already been to your website? By definition, this is a retargeting impression, so even a first touch can be gamed. Unique reach is another easily gamed metric. Gamers just target specific browser configurations or cookies with no data on them, giving the appearance of a large unique reach while keeping costs low.

Gaming 101

Here’s how a simple gaming strategy might work:

Buy a small amount of cheap ads for new cookies across exchanges to capture new and unique reach rates. Then don’t do any further prospecting. Buy as much retargeting as possible to maximize conversion credit.

Next buy the first ad immediately after a user visits the advertiser’s site for the first time to capture more of the first-touch credit.

Also buy lots of cheap retargeting ads – even below-the-fold or out-of-view ads are fine – but bid more and increase frequency as consumers revisit the site and move closer to a conversion.

Once users start the conversion process, capture the last-touch credit by aggressively targeting them on every inventory source, figuring that many will check email, search for a coupon or check social media right before clicking “purchase.”

Now relax and wait for your client to give you more budget.

Try It Yourself

If your attribution solution only cares about last touch and the lower funnel, then that is where your targeting will be focused.

To see an example of unsophisticated retargeting, open a new browser session in privacy or incognito mode. Then visit an advertiser’s site. Take a step toward a conversion, but don’t convert. Then go to an exchange-traded site with multiple ad slots per page and see how many retargeting ads appear. Click the “ad choices” button on each to uncover who is serving them.

Stop Getting Gamed

While we may never be able to fully eliminate gaming tactics, we can try to expose cheaters and increase transparency for everyone. You can start by splitting marketing funnels into two separate phases – prospecting and retargeting – by adding the “first site visit” as an additional point of measurement. This simple action cannot be gamed and is a major step toward preventing unwanted behavior.

Use MRC-accredited viewability standards to significantly reduce the false signaling noise in all attribution models. And get a second opinion by bringing in another solution or implementing an A/B test to look at the marketing funnel from more than one perspective to help eliminate hidden gaming.

Not everyone games attribution, but, unfortunately, many do. Through increased communication and transparency, we can help eliminate this shady underbelly of online advertising and improve advertising efficiencies in measurement and performance for everyone.

Follow Quantcast (@Quantcast) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”