Home Data-Driven Thinking Ad Networks By Any Other Name Are Still the Same: It’s Time To End Shady Arbitrage

Ad Networks By Any Other Name Are Still the Same: It’s Time To End Shady Arbitrage

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Scott Moore, CEO and co-founder at Ad Lightning.

Media arbitrage – buying ad space at one price, adding something of value and reselling it at a higher price to advertisers – has been ad networks’ business model for years.

However, it’s an artifact of the pre-programmatic era that is no longer adding value to the ecosystem. It is instead a vestigial function in today’s programmatic world – extracting value, sucking out the oxygen and contributing to advertiser mistrust.

I estimate there is approximately $10 billion still being made in arbitrage, which suggests the ecosystem is in massive need of cleanup. I predict arbitrage will disappear in the coming years, to the benefit of publishers and advertisers alike.

Arbitrage efficiencies and data

Ad networks initially made sense. Publishers didn’t have to hire a sales force, and advertisers didn’t have to field sales calls from a thousand online publishers. The networks were the pipes that connected the two at some scale, they took their 30% cut and everyone was fine with that.

But while the networks couldn’t offer true programmatic-level scale, they started pushing data targeting for their inventory. But whose data was it, exactly? The data being collected by ad networks was being suctioned up via the ads they were serving. Just drop a line of Javascript into the creative, and voila, you have a path to a rich consumer data set built on the backs of the advertisers and publishers you did business with.

Consumers didn’t have a relationship with Rocket Fuel or other networks like it, but these companies knew quite a lot about consumers, who had no idea their personal data was being suctioned up and monetized. Consumers are only now waking up to the reality that our every page view, click and geolocation, to name a few, are real-time data points in the possession of hundreds of companies we’ve never heard of.

Programmatic, scale and the new ad network

When programmatic came along, it changed the face of the industry, solved the scale problem and made the vast majority of media arbitrage no longer necessary. Legitimate SSPs, DSPs and exchanges provide an incredibly important infrastructure to the $50 billion-plus programmatic ecosystem. The open architecture of the system and the power of real-time bidding have driven tremendous innovation and value creation.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

However, in a complex and fast-moving industry like programmatic advertising, it has become all too easy for upstarts to masquerade as platforms when media arbitrage is their primary bread-winning business mode – this is arbitrage that relies on data as the justification for a price markup. The problem is that the data does not belong to these intermediaries: It belongs to the advertisers and publishers they sit between. For the time being, these companies are hiding their practices in plain sight, knowing that there is no way to prove this data laundering is occurring and no way to enforce the contracts they are breaching.

It’s estimated that $10 billion is running through the ecosystem via arbitrage, even though arbitrage should have gone all but extinct when programmatic was invented. How are they still hanging around?

My expectation is that Darwinism will prevail and ad networks will eventually die out. Media arbitrage will require complete transparency about the nature and source of the value that is being added to the transaction. Providers that use arbitrage to monetize truly legitimate and proprietary data or unique ad formats will leave media arbitrage a small but exciting corner of the ecosystem.

Good news for publishers

Once these ad network copycats finally go extinct, the $10 billion will not evaporate. Instead, it should start to flow to publishers directly, helping their businesses thrive again. Publishers will make more money without doing anything different. They have been the victims here. Once the intermediaries drop, more money will be channeled to them so they can focus on growing and retaining their audiences with even more engaging content.

The future means the publishers will be back at the table with the brands. Programmatic will still play a major role but buyers and sellers can finally talk to each other again.

There is a mountain and a sea between buyers and sellers today, and that needs to change.

Follow Ad Lightning (@AdLightningTech) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Can Publishers Trust The Trade Desk’s New Wrapper?

TTD says OpenAds is not just a reaction to Prebid’s TID change, but a new model for fairer, more transparent ad auctions. So what does the DSP need to do to get publishers to adopt its new auction wrapper?

Scott Spencer’s New Startup Wants To Help Users Monetize Their Online Advertising Data

What happens when an ad tech developer partners with a cybersecurity expert to start a new company? You end up with a consumer product that is both a privacy software service and a programmatic advertising ID.

Former FTC commissioner Alvaro Bedoya speaks to AdExchanger Managing Editor Allison Schiff at Programmatic IO NY 2025.

Advertisers Probably Shouldn’t Target Teens At All, Cautions Former FTC Commissioner

Alvaro Bedoya shared his qualms with digital advertising’s more controversial targeting tactics and how kids use gen AI and social media.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Wall Street Turned Against Ad Tech – But May Learn To Love It Again

What can pureplay ad tech companies do to clean up their rep on the Street?

AppsFlyer and Roku’s New SRN Integration Will Shed Light On CTV Campaign Impact

Roku and AppsFlyer announced the launch of a new self-reporting network (SRN) integration between both companies, which will allow mobile app advertisers to more effectively measure their streaming video campaigns

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

DOJ v. Google: How Judge Brinkema Seems To Be Thinking After Week One

Where the DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial stands after one week’s worth of remedies arguments.