Marketers having to justify their budgets is nothing new, but macroeconomic anxiety is making the stakes feel higher.
According to the IAB, 94% of US advertisers are worried about tariffs, and 45% plan to cut budgets as a result. Similarly, Gartner found that nearly 40% of CMOs are seeking to reduce labor costs this year. As the pressure ratchets up, marketers at agencies and in-house teams are bracing for this question from up top:
“We need to cut spend – why shouldn’t we start with you?”
For most marketers, gathering and presenting performance data is incredibly difficult. Marketers can’t do this fast enough, clearly enough and certainly not with the kind of airtight reporting CFOs demand. It’s not because campaigns aren’t performing; it’s because the systems built to track and tell that story are so tangled that they end up obfuscating it.
A fragmented and disconnected reporting infrastructure, combined with a desire to trim spending, puts teams in a defensive crouch when they need to be moving forward.
Where’s the story?
Marketers aren’t lacking results; they’re lacking access.
Performance data lives across too many platforms, behind too many logins and inside too many differently formatted reports. Every channel has its own dashboard. Every partner has their own scorecard. Trying to stitch it all together into a coherent, compelling narrative feels like doing a jigsaw puzzle during a fire drill.
When the CMO gets a budget challenge from the CFO, the panic begins. Teams (whether in-house or at agency partners) drop whatever they’re doing to dive into spreadsheets, ping vendors for updated numbers and reformat slide decks to make them presentable. The result is several days of work spent wrangling insights that, in a perfect world, would take minutes to compile – and even then, the picture is often incomplete.
There’s no way to confidently defend your value when the proof lives in a dozen different places and half of them don’t talk to each other.
AdExchanger Daily
Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.
Daily Roundup
Fragmentation fuels bad decisions
Fragmented reporting has more insidious effects that extend beyond an acute ‘defend your budget’ scenario. Poor visibility distorts strategy, creating a vicious cycle of sub-par performance that comes back around to threaten marketing budgets from the other side.
Here’s how that cycle plays out: Without a trustworthy view of campaign performance, marketing teams fall into the trap of prioritizing metrics or channels that are easy to report on. This drift can bias teams toward short-term thinking, often constricting strategy into actions that can be easily measured, rather than those which genuinely move the dial. Multitouch campaigns get sliced into isolated parts, and the only data that survives are the bits that fit neatly into a spreadsheet column.
This is not smart strategy; it’s reporting chaos. It’s inefficient, it’s exhausting, and it’s quietly suffocating marketers.
Resolving duct-taped reporting
This reporting chaos – toggling between platforms, chasing down metrics and reverse-engineering insights out of spreadsheets – cemented itself as an unavoidable status quo years ago. Most marketers resigned themselves to manage it as well as possible, simply because there was no other choice.
But that acceptance is now a dangerous complacency. Patchwork tools and one-off reports are no longer the only game in town. Advances in automation technology give marketers a practical solution to modernize the reporting layer of their marketing stack – from automating the data collection and orchestration process to bringing it all together in one central source of truth.
Better data, less stress
When reporting works smoothly, marketing soars.
With the frantic scavenger hunt for data made obsolete, marketers can focus more on offering deeper analysis that justifies their spend and informs how to allocate spend, rather than awkwardly harmonizing data in varying states of rawness. This is where reporting becomes particularly useful – it’s no longer a grainy snapshot of past performance but a living, breathing source for strategy and understanding.
With automated reporting that enables communication of a deeper performance story, the value-add of marketing becomes undeniable. Instead of justifying budgets postmortem, teams can use clear, consolidated reporting to forecast growth, reallocate spend and back every decision with data that leadership trusts.
The result: fewer platforms, fewer manual errors, fewer hours wasted and better performance all around.
Resilient marketing starts with smarter reporting
Macroeconomic pressure isn’t going away anytime soon, and neither is the burden on marketers to prove their value. Marketing teams need more efficient ways to tell their story. Moreover, they need more reliable intelligence to direct their budgets (however big or small) toward the greatest ROI.
When everyone else is in panic mode, the team with a clear line of sight to better performance – across every channel, at every moment – gains a significant advantage and creates an opportunity to showcase marketing as a revenue generator.
In the face of economic uncertainty, clarity is currency. Marketing teams that treat reporting infrastructure as a strategic asset – rather than an operational afterthought – will be better equipped to defend spend, adjust with agility and demonstrate value. When data fluency is in the team’s DNA, marketing is more easily recognized as essential to business success.
