Home Ad Exchange News Not An Elephant, But Can We Talk About The HIPAA In The Room?; The End Of ‘Business As Usual’

Not An Elephant, But Can We Talk About The HIPAA In The Room?; The End Of ‘Business As Usual’

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

HIP-HIP- … Hooray? 

Meta is being sued again. (We’re sure you’re not surprised.) And this time it’s about health-related data.

In June, The Markup uncovered that the websites of 33 of Newsweek’s top 100 hospitals had a Meta pixel embedded that was transmitting data from online portals to Facebook when patients scheduled appointments.

Hospitals need site tags to fire when a patient schedules an appointment or is directed to a clinic so as to be able to track patients in its care system. They have legitimate use cases for the data and for carrying a Meta pixel. Problem is, Facebook uses the data for targeted advertising, retargeting, prospecting and attribution.

Meta was hit with a HIPAA violation this week because it didn’t sign business associate agreements, the HIPAA-mandated legal contract between parties that share protected health information (PHI).

The only reason Facebook is getting sued is because it used PHI that came directly from hospitals. If Facebook had received health information from, say, a Fitbit or period-tracking app, HIPAA wouldn’t even apply – which means HIPAA doesn’t provide enough protection in a post-Roe world.

Since the overturn of Roe, abortion rights advocates have been pressing digital platforms about health data misuse for advertising purposes, because that data could now be used as evidence to identify and incriminate doctors or a woman who sought an abortion. 

Google vowed to delete location data linked to clinic visitations, Snapchat is trying to weed out pregnancy center fronts in its Map service, and dating app OkCupid actually donated ad inventory to Planned Parenthood.

Welcome To The New BAU

Speaking of the Meta pixel, a new marketing research paper by two business school professors and two Meta execs actually quantifies the added cost incurred when businesses are unable to attribute conversions using the Meta pixel or SDK.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

According to the report, which was published at SSRN, when businesses have access to pixel or SDK conversation data, the average cost per incremental customer is roughly $43.88. The researchers refer to this scenario as “BAU” or “business as usual.”

But that number jumps 37% to $60.19 when conversion data is limited to the platform itself, which is often the case now on iOS.

Putting aside the fact that two of the authors are Meta researchers, the implication is clear: Apple’s policy changes have a direct and measurable impact on broad parts of the consumer market.

Ecommerce and retail are hit particularly hard, especially “Apparel Accessories” and “Durable Household Goods,” such as mattresses, furniture, electronics and kitchen equipment – all (now former) power categories behind the DTC boom on Facebook and Instagram.

GDP-Armed And Ready

Coverage of GDPR investigations and penalties usually focuses on the Silicon Valley giants – and for good reason.

Google, Amazon and Meta-owned companies have been fined roughly $1.5 billion combined under the law, which is many times more than every other GDPR fine put together. 

But European data protection authorities are also bringing a steady drumbeat of smaller cases, often focused on marketing-related violations.

Just this week, a data regulator from Lower Saxony (that’s a state within Germany, for those who aren’t familiar) landed an almost $1 million fine on an unnamed credit company that collected behavioral data without consent or legitimate interest and used that data to create segments of users to be targeted online.

In July, France’s data regulator dinged TotalEnergies, an oil and energy company, for continuing to use data for direct marketing purposes even after users had unsubscribed. (TotalEngines also made moves to prevent customers from unsubscribing, which is a major no-no.)

Oh, and Swedish buy-now-pay-later service Klarna received an $800,000 fine earlier this year for failing to inform customers about how “​​personal data was processed in one of the company’s services.” It’s not explicitly stated, but read between the lines and the likely offender here is Klarna’s Marketing Solutions business, which uses first-party data to target and attribute ads.

But Wait, There’s More!

Your email strategy may blow up sooner than you think. [AdMonsters]

French iOS app developers sue Apple over its App Store fees. [Reuters]

Meta is paying media companies to post Instagram Reels. [Digiday]

TikTok influencers say the platform’s payout to creators is less attractive than YouTube’s. [Insider]

Even so, TikTok is set to outpace YouTube in influencer marketing spend by 2024. [TechCrunch]

You’re Hired!

Former SiriusXM and Pandora exec Thomas Joseph is the new Integral Ad Science CTO. [release]

Fyllo launches in APAC with former Amobee SVP Robert Woolfrey as APAC managing director. [Marketing Interactive]

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.