Home Ad Exchange News Netflix Is Here To Make A Loonie, Eh?; On The Hypocrisy Of Modern Marketers

Netflix Is Here To Make A Loonie, Eh?; On The Hypocrisy Of Modern Marketers

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Skipping The Basics

Canada is Netflix’s testing ground for tinkering.

Netflix has not only been diligent about cracking down on Canadian password sharers; it rather quietly removed its Basic plan (which allows viewing on one screen at a time) in Canada this week, TechCrunch reports.

Basic is Netflix’s cheapest ad-free option, and nixing it points to a reprioritization in favor of advertising.

Canadian subscribers now only have two options: They can either subscribe to the ad-free deluxe version or watch ads. Former password-sharing freeloaders are likely to choose the cheapest plan, if any.

On the one hand, this is a sign of advertisers pressuring Netflix to increase its supply. Netflix won’t crank up the ad load too much, so it must add viewers.

But there’s a positive spin for advertising, too, since Netflix already said its ARPU is higher for ad viewers than for higher-paying subscribers. This creates a strong incentive to shift from ad-free viewership to advertising.

There was always a risk associated with Netflix’s embrace of AVOD, though. Once the ad train starts, it either derails spectacularly or chugs forward until an ad-free viewer is worth more per month than an ad-free subscriber.

Netflix practically has a shareholder responsibility to force-switch as many people as possible to ads.

Of Mice And Marketers

Marketers are quick to deny responsibility when it comes to monetizing made-for-advertising (MFA) sites and other related crud. It’s like a game of “not it.”

They’ve got the fig leaves to prove their innocence, including verification tech that says their ads are squeaky clean.

But there’s little appetite for self-reflection when it slows down the sales machine or reduces ROI calculations. As Digiday notes, despite loud calls by marketers insisting that platforms undergo audits to increase transparency, momentum eventually petered out.

Instead, platform algorithms have become even less transparent over time.

The biggest failure by marketers hasn’t been of competence or investment, however; it’s a widespread failure of leadership. There are vanishingly few high-level marketers at important or even midsize brands willing to catalyze real change by openly critiquing large platforms, such as Google and Meta.

Even Digiday’s story only cites anonymous brand marketers.

And even when Meta screws up big time or marketers have serious issues with Performance Max campaigns, buyers have strong things to say in private … but nothing they’d put their name behind.

A Brave New Prompt

“Made for SEO” content and MFA websites are hardly new. But scammers are now well on their way to making a business out of auto-generated sites that siphon traffic from legit publishers.

A study of auto-generated content identified by NewsGuard found that major advertisers do end up on MFA sites, largely served by Google Ads, the MIT Technology Review reports. (The piece gives “programmatic advertising” the scare quote treatment, which even The New York Times stopped doing six or seven years ago).

Programmatic exchanges all forbid MFA content, but “do not appear to uniformly enforce these policies,” says Krzysztof Franaszek, founder of Adalytics and an ad tech researcher.

“Many of these ad exchanges continue to serve ads on [made-for-advertising] sites even if they appear to be in violation,” he says.

Google’s PMax, for example, will automatically bid on inventory across the Google publisher network and advertisers don’t have control over their targeting strategies or the ability to segment and block certain sites.

Those advertisers won’t know whether their ads showed up on MFA sites until someone screen-grabs them.

But Wait, There’s More!

Amazon, friction and the FTC. [Stratechery]

YouTube is testing an online games offering. [WSJ]

AI is killing the old web – and the new web struggles to be born. [The Verge]

You’re Hired!

Jacki Kelley quits Dentsu to return to IPG as chief client and business officer [Campaign], and Dentsu promotes Michael Komasinski to replace her. [Campaign]

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”