Home On TV & Video Could Brand Safety Be The Achilles Heel In Netflix’s AVOD Ambitions?

Could Brand Safety Be The Achilles Heel In Netflix’s AVOD Ambitions?

SHARE:

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is by Ken Weiner, CTO at GumGum

Up until recently, Netflix’s climb to the top as kingpin disruptor of the small-screen had been relatively unblemished. But faced with waning subscribers, the streaming giant has been forced to adapt.

In a game-changing move for the market, Netflix just launched its ad-supported tier, offering a Basic with Ads plan across the U.S. and other countries. Charging a rumored $65 CPM with a $20 million minimum annual spend, Netflix has gone big, commanding rates that are more expensive than other streaming giants.

Many advertisers have jumped at the chance to align themselves with the platform’s huge closed-loop content inventory and global audience reach. Yet there are still unanswered questions over how Netflix and other AVOD streaming contenders will successfully navigate brand safety for a highly sensitized market.

Risk versus reward

Netflix may have an ace up its sleeve with its premium customer experience. But, like other broadcasters with AVOD models (including Hulu, Paramount+ and Peacock), it must now grapple with how to protect brands from controversial content. 

After all, the brand’s most-watched shows this year include “The Watcher,” “28 Days Haunted” and, most disturbingly for advertisers, the ultra-violent “Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story,” a graphic retelling of the serial killer’s infamous murder spree.

Not only do these programs carry the risk of reputational damage – “Dahmer” has already attracted complaints from victims’ families – but they’re also entirely unsuited to family brands. Netflix has ruled out running ads on kids’ shows, but that potentially leaves a large swath of middle-ground brands stranded in between. Many will want to make the most of bespoke ads, while weighing the gamble of potentially untested and unpredictable inventory.

Having fast-tracked its ad model, there is still very little detail on how Netflix will handle diverse ad contexts or safeguard brand suitability within its vast, international content repertoire.

Playing catch-up

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

What we know is that Netflix will run ads for four minutes per hour of content in a way that’s relevant to the accompanying creative. There’s a sense that this should somehow be enough for brands keen to cash in on the novelty and prestige of Netflix advertising. But that won’t be sustainable.

Such is the rate of growth in CTV that ad tech has struggled to keep pace. And with the AVOD sector growing by the day, it’s not just Netflix but all media players in this space that should be examining the implications of that gap. 

Video streaming still relies on very basic metadata that cannot pick up on vital nuance within videos. Developments in machine learning may be helpful here through tech that can automatically break down video content on a frame-by-frame level to better understand the nature of a video and its suitability for advertising.

Similarly, progressions in AI may allow for “intra-video metadata” (i.e., tags that describe the content adjacent to each ad marker within CTV video, providing a rich level of detail on that excerpt). So instead of avoiding a film altogether because of the risk of violent or graphic scenes, advertisers would be able to identify where and when the threat actually occurs and avoid it.

A new kind of model

To give brands this level of reassurance around streaming, however, the industry needs to demand a more robust and consistent solution. This should prioritize CTV brand safety, but also signpost transparent targeting, analytics and third-party tracking options.

Netflix’s partnership with UK ratings agency BARB, which will publish daily streaming and monthly reach figures, is one small step in the right direction for transparency. A more cohesive framework for brand safety, however, is still to come. Industry bodies such as the IAB are likely to play a major role in creating a standardized set of practices.

CTV is still largely uncharted territory for the ad industry. But it’s an area we rapidly need to master to protect consumers and brands, while creating a rich ecosystem that will benefit our entire industry.

Follow GumGum (@GumGum) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

For more articles featuring Ken Weiner, click here.

Must Read

Jamie Seltzer, global chief data and technology officer, Havas Media Network, speaks to AdExchanger at CES 2026.

CES 2026: What’s Real – And What’s BS – When It Comes To AI

Ad industry experts call out trends to watch in 2026 and separate the real AI use cases having an impact today from the AI hype they heard at CES.

New Startup Pinch AI Tackles The Growing Problem Of Ecommerce Return Scams

Fraud is eating into retail profits. A new startup called Pinch AI just launched with $5 million in funding to fight back.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

CPG Data Seller SPINS Moves Into Media With MikMak Acquisition

On Wednesday, retail and CPG data company SPINS added a new piece with its acquisition of MikMak, a click-to-buy ad tech and analytics startup that helps optimize their commerce media.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Valvoline Shifted Marketing Gears When It Became A Pure-Play Retail Brand

Believe it or not, car oil change service company Valvoline is in the midst of a fascinating retail marketing transformation.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

The Big Story: Live From CES 2026

Agents, streamers and robots, oh my! Live from the C-Space campus at the Aria Casino in Las Vegas, our team breaks down the most interesting ad tech trends we saw at CES this year.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.