Home The Sell Sider The Match Game: Publishers And Ad Tech Vendors Need To Find The Best Fit

The Match Game: Publishers And Ad Tech Vendors Need To Find The Best Fit

SHARE:

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Laura Gaffney, vice president of global publisher and business development at Prohaska Consulting.

When the fit is right, the relationship between publisher and ad tech developer can create a powerful synergy. The benefits are abundantly clear, as I have seen in my work on both sides of the publisher-ad tech equation.

In today’s increasingly crowded market place, the right connection can be hard to find. Too often, when it comes to the sales cycle, ad tech companies put enormous emphasis on their product’s technical capabilities, yet fail to establish a solid business case by articulating the value proposition that will resonate with the publisher.

So what can publishers do to cut quickly through the tech speak and gear up for the most productive conversation? How can you be sure that when you pick up the phone for a cold call or compile an initial list of companies to reach out to that you are talking to the right people? You don’t want to waste anybody’s time, and certainly not your own.

I see three factors that can make the difference in creating a successful publisher and ad tech vendor dynamic: effective communication, clear product differentiation and value mapping.

Setting Expectations

A publisher’s key priorities are audience, content, user experience and revenue. Ad tech companies need to take a deep dive into which problem(s) their solution addresses. Their marketing messaging and sales strategy should articulate the product benefits with publisher-specific priorities (and ROI) top of mind.

Publishers should expect any potential vendor to have done their (math) homework. If the vendor is saying that their solution will increase revenue, they should come prepped with the numbers. That takes work and detailed background knowledge. But even if the numbers aren’t being run specifically for a publisher’s site, they should at least reflect the category in which it operates.

Publishers should also expect the vendor to tailor their sales messaging to their specific requirements. Publishers are busy. Beyond knowing how a vendor’s “unique technology capabilities” might affect its site performance or user experience, publishers don’t have the time for a deep tech dive. A good vendor will talk the language publishers understand. The pitch should be less about the tech creds of the solution and more about how the solution will benefit the publisher.

If vendors don’t hit that mark right out of the gate, it should give publishers pause for thought.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Standing Out From The Crowd

Ten years ago, when I was selling an in-text solution to publishers, it was easy to get a response; I could just pick up the phone and talk to a publisher. Today publishers can get an average of 10 to 12 outreaches a day.

It’s a crowded marketplace. The advent of cloud-based solutions, such as AWS, has lowered the barrier to entry into the world of ad tech. Increased competition and the plethora of solutions available today can leave publishers overwhelmed; it is increasingly difficult for them to distinguish between one company’s tech advantages versus another.

So publishers need to do their homework, too, or they could end up buried trying to find the right product for their needs. It all starts with knowing their goals. Ahead of a meeting, publishers should give vendors a needs analysis and help them understand their limitations, too. Publishers should also tell them about company policies, such as no-way autoplay, that will help them better tailor their solution to fit the site.

The Power Of Value Mapping

If vendors take the time upfront to perform critical value-mapping exercises, they may be worth a second look.

Value mapping need not be a resource-intensive exercise, but it must be an iterative process throughout the product life cycle. If vendors could get the right people in the room and think about the product from the publisher’s point of view, it could make all the difference in not just creating a great product, but in selling it to publishers most effectively.

When publishers are approached in a consultative manner and get to express what is important to them, a value proposition can be clearly articulated and a match made. This paves the way for a successful partnership and not just a transactional, low-value sale.

In the SaaS model, this is referred to as customer success, which reduces churn and creates long-term value. These strategic partnerships can create lasting value for everyone in the ecosystem – the vendor, the publisher, the consumer and investors.

Follow Prohaska Consulting (@TeamProhaska) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.