Home The Sell Sider Let’s Stop Talking About The Yield Benefits Of Header Bidding

Let’s Stop Talking About The Yield Benefits Of Header Bidding

SHARE:

rachelparkinThe Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Rachel Parkin, senior vice president of strategy and sales at CafeMedia.

Header bidding is here to stay. So it’s time we stop talking about what the technology does for publishers and start talking about what it solves for in the marketplace.

Header bidding is not just a publisher conversation – it’s a programmatic conversation.

Much of the talk on header bidding has centered on the publisher benefits, namely increased yield and higher CPMs. Yet, buyers are focused on access, scale and audience buying. When agencies and advertisers question the benefits of header bidding, they deserve a clear answer: Header bidding makes the vision of programmatic as the conduit for all media buying a reality.

A More Efficient Market

Although we may have called it by the same name, we weren’t really doing programmatic advertising before the arrival of header bidding. In the old tag-based programmatic universe, there was a clear information asymmetry that prevented the growth of the channel and relegated programmatic to the bottom-of-the-barrel status in the ad-serving waterfall.

Without header bidding, publishers had no insight into which impressions an advertiser was interested in buying and which impressions they weren’t. This meant that programmatic inventory could only be offered up after all direct-sold, 100% fill deals were fulfilled. As a result, the size and quality of any programmatic inventory was capped.

The same lack of visibility applied to the buyer side, too. Buyers who wanted to push significant volume or specific audiences through programmatic channels were unable to see all of a publisher’s inventory because only a fraction filtered down to programmatic channels. This uncertainty created a vicious cycle, limiting buyers from allocating more budget toward programmatic and even holding back premium buyers from entering the market.

Header bidding solves for this information asymmetry and enables buyers and sellers alike to have 100% visibility into each other’s programmatic intent. Buyers now see all impressions available for sale from publishers and have the opportunity to bid on any impression. Publishers now know exactly when a buyer wants to buy an impression and can enable programmatic bidders to win a larger share of their inventory. Header bidding is not only fueling the growth of the programmatic marketplace as a whole, it’s enabling everything that advertisers sought to gain via programmatic buying in the first place.

Access

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Header bidding gives programmatic buyers the same access to inventory as direct buyers. The certainty of 100% fill grants security to publishers that are increasingly comfortable letting programmatic compete with direct deals and even sometimes be prioritized above direct deals. Priority can be set individually for any deal ID, meaning buyers can get a true first look and making it possible to deliver on a programmatic guaranteed basis.

The use of header bidding doesn’t imply that the highest bidder always has to win. Rather it gives publishers the flexibility to organize a programmatic waterfall in whatever way makes the most sense across all of their advertisers, which ultimately gives buyers the access they are looking for.

Scale

Header bidding opens up the programmatic flood gates for buyers. Without header bidding, buyers only had the opportunity to bid on remnant inventory. With header bidding, the inventory pool is unlimited, and now includes premium, highly viewable placements. Since publishers can now recognize, prioritize and decision on high-value bids when they come in, buyers get more unfettered access to premium inventory sources at scale.

By competing higher in the waterfall, buyers also get more consistent access to that scale, in return making it possible for them to shift a greater share of their budgets to programmatic channels. With a clear signal for which impressions an advertiser wants, a publisher can even prioritize programmatic buyers and commit to inventory guarantees.

Actionable Audience Data

Header bidding creates a place for any audience data to thrive, large or small. Buyers know exactly who they want to reach. The challenge has often been finding enough of them with the available programmatic inventory sources. Targeting based on an advertiser’s first-party or even third-party data is much more readily achievable with header bidding since it’s now possible to prioritize a deal such that an advertiser will win nearly 100% of the time they bid.

Regardless of whether there are 1,000 or 1 million people in an audience, a header deal with the right price and priority can ensure that an advertiser reaches its goal of delivering against that desired audience. The ability to set different priorities for high-value audiences gives buyers an assurance that they can scale on any audience, making programmatic data buying fully actionable.

Taking these benefits of header bidding together – access, scale and actionable audiences – allows buyers and sellers to take a large step toward a future where all media changes hands programmatically. Header bidding is so much more than a yield optimization tool.

It is what makes programmatic premium. It is what makes programmatic guaranteed possible. It is what makes programmatic programmatic.

Follow CafeMedia (@CafeMedia) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.