Home Privacy Ghostery Will Offer Ad Blocking VPN

Ghostery Will Offer Ad Blocking VPN

SHARE:

Ghostery aims to help users block the trackers it has been helping them monitor… for a price.

The company has developed a VPN and blocking tool that will shut down trackers embedded in desktop applications.

The tools, which entered an invite-only beta on Thursday, will be grouped together under the name Ghostery Midnight and sold as a subscription package for the sky-high price point of $14 a month.

How does Ghostery justify the steep cost? There are a lot of free VPNs on the market, but they’re generally free for a reason, said Melissa Bashur, the product manager at Ghostery in charge of Ghostery Midnight.

“You use a VPN to prevent data collection,” she said, “yet a lot of them are actually being used for data collection.”

Bashur admitted Ghostery is a little “late to the game” with its VPN. NordVPN and ExpressVPN are just two examples of already-popular subscription VPNs, and both are cheaper than Midnight. Still, adding a VPN to Ghostery’s anti-tracker browser extension is a logical next move and a natural fit with the existing product suite.

On top of the VPN, Ghostery Midnight includes an ad/tracker blocker for desktop apps.

People are generally aware that they’re being tracked when they browse the internet. But desktop apps – think email clients (eg. Outlook), messaging apps (eg. Slack) and entertainment apps such (eg. Hulu) – are also collecting data which can be appended to profiles and used for a variety of purposes, including ad targeting.

Ghostery has found “numerous third-party tracking companies running in apps,” even subscription apps, Bashur said. Google and Facebook’s respective analytics trackers are two of the most prevalent.

“App developers implement their services to gain insights into their own products,” she said. “In return, Google and Facebook get a much wider reach of user data.”

If there are banner ads in an ad-supported desktop app, like Spotify, for example, Midnight will block them too, along with any data-collecting trackers.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Clearly, Ghostery wholly embraces its role as an ad blocker. But there was a time in the recent past when Ghostery was extremely uncomfortable with that designation. That was back when Ghostery was still a part of Evidon, whose primary business model was helping B2B clients, including ad tech companies, manage their digital governance.

When Ghostery and Evidon split in 2017 – Ghostery was acquired by a German browser called Cliqz, and Evidon refocused on governance – Ghostery was able to let its ad blocker flag fly.

“It was definitely a tightrope walk we had to walk trying to balance the business needs of enterprise clients and the privacy needs of consumer users,” said Jeremy Tillman, Ghostery’s president and head of product marketing, one of five Ghostery employees who made the move to Cliqz as part of the acquisition.

“After that, though, the gloves came off,” Tillman said. “Now our No. 1 priority can be our users, although our experience still gives us empathy for the business needs of companies.”

Empathy – but not sympathy. “There’s no reason that the status quo is the best way to do things,” Tillman said.

That’s a point of view shared by a growing number of web browsers, namely Safari with its Intelligent Tracking Prevention anti-tracking tech and Firefox with Enhanced Tracking Protection.

But isn’t the trend toward browsers blocking trackers by default bad for Ghostery’s business? Who needs to download an extension or buy an anti-tracking product if user agents are providing that capability automatically.

Tillman says that the moves being made by Safari and Firefox are helpful in that they raise awareness of “the breadth and depth of the tracker ecosystem.”

Must Read

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.