Home On TV & Video We Should Focus On Outcomes Over Turf Wars

We Should Focus On Outcomes Over Turf Wars

SHARE:

On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Matt Bayer, senior vice president of advanced TV, cross screen and emerging channels at Cadreon.

It is a well-known and undisputed fact: Audiences are consuming more video on nontraditional platforms, such as TV streaming devices, smartphones and tablets, and they’re spending less time watching video via traditional cable and satellite services. In a new streaming world, connected TV and OTT providers are emerging as the major players. As a result, they are redefining the customer expectation of the video consumption experience.

This is the state of video today, yet much of the debate continues to revolve around agency team ownership, as the channel sits at the intersection of classically defined TV and digital distribution channels.

While this conversation may be a hot-button issue, it lacks purpose and vision. The problem can be solved by teams focusing on driving client-specific outcomes and adopting an approach that is audience-led and channel-neutral. It’s about delivering business results for marketers across channels.


We must take a multilayered approach in the planning and implementation of a successful campaign. The first step is always to gain an understanding of the desired outcome. Once the goal has been determined, the next step is to identify the audiences and approach that have the highest propensity to deliver said outcome.

With that foundation in place, a plan is constructed that reaches the right audiences wherever and whenever those audiences are consuming media, regardless of channel, device, platform or touchpoint. A touchpoint could be linear TV, video on demand, connected TV, display, online video, digital out of home, streaming audio, terrestrial audio, podcast or print, but ultimately, the channel is determined by the audience’s consumption behavior and the desired campaign outcomes.

Given the plethora of media touchpoints accessible to high-value audiences today, along with the people-based and cookie-based data available, marketers’ targeting capabilities have become extremely advanced. Campaigns can reach target audiences channel-agnostically, activate against those audiences, measure real outcomes, such as sales, visits or return on advertising spend, and then optimize against those performance indicators.

In order to access those audiences and eventually, optimize against them, it is often most effective to take a channel-neutral approach when crafting a strategy. This foundation allows marketers to identify the high-value audiences that are most likely to deliver the campaign’s desired outcome. The next step is to match those audiences across all channels and determine which ones the audience groups are engaging with.

After those steps are taken, performance indicators can be utilized to optimize to the highest value audiences by leveraging programmatic campaign management to manage reach and frequency. This can drive dramatic outcomes, with up to a 100% increase in site visitation, significant lift in incremental visitation and an overall increase in sales.

Ultimately, the results speak for themselves. It’s clear that it would be most beneficial to shift the conversation to focus on the audiences best positioned to deliver marketers’ outcomes. In doing so, as an industry, we will bring the attention back to the ultimate goal: demonstrating the role paid media plays in helping marketers drive their business forward.

Follow Cadreon (@Cadreon_IPG) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”